Driving in a car is an alibi.

I think an alibi, to be effective, has to place the suspect away from the scene of the crime or prove he could not have committed the crime.

Driving a car, alone, is not a good alibi when the prosecution have video from 22 locations which they say are consistent in place, time and direction of travel with the suspect's car driving between his apartment and the murder scene, including driving around the crime scene 4 times when the murders happened then speeding away just after. An "alibi" saying he was driving in the area alone seems to reinforce the prosecution narrative, not disprove it.... Some people talk out their elbow.

You don’t know the law.

True. But I do think an alibi has to suggest the suspect was not at the scene at the time of a crime. Thus Kohberger being out driving alone in the area at 4.00am seems to be an anti-alibi, an inverse-alibi, an non-alibi, a past-alibi -- an alibi which is pining for the fjords.

and the names and addresses of the witnesses upon whom he intends to rely to establish alibi

Ursa Major, Polaris, Orion and Ceti Alpha V, and a particularly large cloud shaped like an angry platypus.....

pour liquor down the throats of plebs with a funnel until they die. Then they drag them out in ditches

Or very drunk under-age drinkers sometimes fall in ditches?

cleaned up what would be that latent footprint?

No one cleaned it - it retained the diamond pattern of the shoe sole.

How does a cleaned up shoe print retain a shoe print shape and also the shoe sole pattern. The clean up must have been as ineffective and impractical as the clean-up conspiracy messaging on here...

who claims his phone, at least, wasn't anywhere near the KR residence

That is not written anywhere in the "alibi". Perhaps you read a different alibi from another case.

was latent meaning cleaned up

Latent does not mean cleaned up. It was visualised with a stain and presumptive blood test.

How did it retain the diamond sole pattern if it was cleaned? Indeed how did it retain a shoe print shape if it was cleaned up?

foot print was not Bryan Kroberger size

The size of the footprint has not been disclosed, so I'm curious what you base that on? It is very likely that it is a match to Kohberger's size and will give further context and correlation to the eye witness description, DNA under body and car at the scene.

You also just posted that the foot print was cleaned up. Which was it - cleaned up, or of a size identified not to match Kohberger?

basing this on an uncredited witness…

What do you mean uncredited - she is identified and is being quoted from a police interview in a document submitted to a judge under penalty of perjury. Until the trial and actual testimony that seems as official as can be at this stage? Who are the witnesses who saw Dylan's boyfriend at the scene in his truck....?

bloody footprint was not seen by naked eye how is that not cleaned up?

It was latent, but it retained the diamond shoe sole pattern..... if the floor was wiped or mopped there would be no shoe print pattern....

I dont think the PCA can be thrown out - it was to obtain an arrest warrant, done and dusted and in the past now

The one from the gas station shows a car going in the wrong direction

The gas station video is not mentioned in the PCA, is not one of the 22 car videis - because it is not a white Elantra.

This makes sense. The "someone's here" also suggests XK being surprised seeing figure in house. Ear buds..?

go to hospital and get better only to be brought back

How does this relate to the stabbings? Sorry if I am slow on the uptake in spotting a connection, was this not 3 years previous?

Well how do we know?

Oh, sorry - i mistook you saying the truck belonged to Dylan's boyfriend with there being some scrap of evidence for that. But now you seem to be saying it is just a black truck, and he also owns a black truck, so it must be his? That doesn't seem very robust evidence at all. Seems a bit flakey tbh.

noticing the black truck owned by Dylan boyfriend

Gosh! Did he leave his DNA on the sheath under a body too? I wonder if it even occurred to the police and FBI to check the people most connected to the residents of the house!

How do we know it us his truck though?

Says the CAST report the FBI won't hand over

No, it is in the PCA. A draft of the CAST report was provided iirc.

people should question if this is accurate.

As Kohberger's own alibi confirms it, seems quite accurate

You can't see plates on any video

The car is moving synchronously with the phone at 2.47am in Pullman and from 4.48am south of Pullman back to Kohberger's apartment. That suggests it is his car - or his phone fell in an identical car but he retrieved ut before going back to Moscow at 9.00am.

the FBI expert got the model wron

The PCA states the suspect car is 2011-2016 Elantra. In what way is that "wrong". There may indeed have been more, better or different angle videos accumulated after the first week.

"the prosecution have video from 22 locations which they say are consistent in place, time and direction of travel
Are you sure about this? Haven't you been following this case? Have you read the PCA? Because the prosecution does not have this information.

Here is a list of the car video locations which you say is false and does not exist, from the PCA.

2.44am north on Nevada Street, Pullman; 2.53am SE Nevada Street, Pullman; 3.26am Indian Hills Drive, Moscow; 3.28am Styner Avenue, Moscow; 3.29am King Road ( x 3 sightings at intersection of King Road/ Queen Road from 3.29am onward); 4.04am Queen Road Apartments block 500 #52; 4.20am exiting King Road; 3.29 - 4.20am approx at Ridge Road (Walenta Drive); 5.25am Johnson Road, Pullman; 5.27am onwards, in Pullman at:  Bishop Boulevard; North West on SR 270; Stadium Way, northward; Stadium Way at Nevada Street; Grimes Way; Wilson Road; ;Cougar Way;

There are also now additional video locations known from defense filings at Ridge Road on Walenta Drive and on the main Pullman to Moscow Road,

how can you state with this much confidence that those phone pings align with the movements of his car?

Because this is stated exactly in the PCA, three times:

https://preview.redd.it/267ygezof5yc1.jpeg?width=633&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=17bf8c9db10a0269eac83ea15a5699f742dab875

There may of course be variation is quality of video and car angles shown from the first videos obtained Nov 18-20 and videos obtained later. The phone data was not obtained until after December 23rd. The synchronous movement of the phone with the car provides additional context and solidifies the identification of the car as Kohberger's.

Your logic seems to be that only the first car videos found indicate the strength of the identification, not subsequent evidence. It is a bit like arguing that since the sheath DNA did not show a match in CODIS when submitted November 20th it is not very valuable, ignoring the subsequent testing comparing the sheath DNA to Kohberger cheek swab done after December 30th.

The totality of evidence gives context to individual pieces of evidence - thus Kohberger's DNA under a body inside the house is given context by his car speeding from the scene at the time and him matching the eye witness description. You seem to want to either deny existing evidence like car videos, or use/ quote them very selectively such as taking car video but ignoring movement of the phone.

BK was driving in car up until 4:04

So you accept that the car on video driving in King Road at 4.04am is Kohbergers?

Could have been anyone on X's TikTok, in fact I think it was the killer himself

Why would the killer use XK's phone at 4.12am?