This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Before the arrest, investigators monitored Kohberger outside of his parents' Pennsylvania home. He was allegedly seen multiple times wearing surgical gloves and observed putting trash bags inside of the garbage can of a neighbor. The items were sent to the Idaho State Lab for testing.
Kohberger was taken into custody by an FBI SWAT team and Pennsylvania State Police on December 30 at the home of his parents in Monroe County, Pennsylvania. At the time of his arrest, authorities allegedly found Kohberger in the kitchen dressed in a shirt and shorts, while wearing examination gloves and putting trash into separate zip-lock baggies.
There's also the ID cards he was hiding in a glove.
While I haven't seen much discussion surrounding these details, I find them pretty interesting. My main questions are: - Why was BK wearing gloves all the time? Is this significant in any way? - Why did BK put the trash into separate zip-lock bags, and why did he put it in the neighbor's trash can? - Does BK have contamination OCD, or was he well-aware authorities could search the family's trash (for DNA) and trying to plan ahead?
They all cite the same unreliable source who took the original claim down
The source was the deputy DA/ prosecutor, Mancuso. Why is he "unreliable"?
What is really weird, and shows a confounding bias to your thinking, is just 20 minutes ago you were quoting the mayor of Moscow to support one of your wilder theories that the police are lying about the murders happening after 4.00am. You even said because he (mayor) was an "official" he was a valid source - why does that not apply to a prosecutor talking about details of an arrest?
selective and contradictory sources, evidence, reports are being cherry picked to support a partial view perhaps
It’s BRC who removed their claim
You posted above that BRC "recanted" the story/ attribution. Can you link to the recanting, or retraction? Thanks
The source is not Mr. Mancuso directly
Now there is a video of Mancuso saying this directly, could you explain your earlier claims that the TV news station had "recanted" this and "did not stand behind their report". AS there is video of Manuso saying it, why would the news story be "recanted" and retracted as you said?
yes. Bears without sharp objects apparently
Perhaps these were the more clerical, office type bears, who respect plastic folders, ziplocks, folder dividers and such organising stationery. They also struggle with the slider opening mechanism on small ziplock bags as their paws are too large to manipulate the doofer.
That just shows the article is no longer live. Lots of news sources take down older articles for storage/ cost reasons.
You specifically stated the original source "recanted"
Can you link to this recanting, please and thanks - that would be a retraction/ correction, not an article being taken off a news website routinely because it aged out.
Prosecutor Mancuso ( the "unreliable source" according to you) is on video here ("the recanted " tv news spot according to you) talking about the gloves/ trash thing that had no source according to you.... How baffling?!!
The original source Deleted it.
You said on this thread, in several places that the source was "unreliable", the news station had "recanted" the story and the news station "did not stand behind the story".
Now we see it was not recanted, the source is on video directly saying exactly what was claimed. It seems like you exaggerated all the "recanting" and "not standing behind their story" stuff?
Yes it is…..
Video exists tho
So the news station "recanted" the story that prosecutor Mancuso said Kohberger was wearing gloves, sorting trash....because they had Mancuso on video saying exactly that?
So, did the tv station "recant" and withdraw the story, and "not stand behind the story" because the "source was unreliable" as you claimed? You have carelessly, by mistake I am sure, omitted any reference to your recanting claims?
Weird for a news station to recant a story due to an unreliable source, when a very reliable source, the very one quoted, is clearly on video stating exactly what was reported??
How baffling!!??
So I guess the original article was not "recanted" as you claimed? Perhaps an exaggeration?
are rules about all trash being bagged and secured,
In small ziplock bags.....? Are these white collar, office type bears?
Get the fuck over your obsession with me.
At present it is more an interest in your exaggerations about the Mancuso story.
The issue was you claiming the news station "recanted", withdrew and "did not stand behind" the story of the gloves/ trash which, you said, was from an "unreliable source". As there is video it seems clearly not recanted or indirect in sourcing.
Stop this obsession with me.
What good are you contributing to this discussion?
Debunking exaggerations or inaccuracy, like the claim about "recanted" news articles with no direct source, to describe unrecanted articles with a direct and credible source, is of some, if limited, use I think
I said you fabricated that the TV news station, BRC, "recanted" the story; as they did not recant it
that you saying that the recanting was because the "source was unreliable" is not supported, as the source us a DA and in video
Saying the news station and article quoted Mancuso, the source, "indirectly" is not supported as he us on video
How many news articles are published, followed by another article with no further content other than just saying " we stand behind the previous article"??
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 6 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/Idaho4/comm...
Increases humidity, water activity, promotes microbial degradation of cells, DNA etc