Things got a little backed up - we're processing the data and things should be back to normal within the hour.

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

8
r/futurology vs r/collapse : collapse is winning?
Post Body

I am one of those who visits both subs daily and for a long time (almost a year) I have been wholly compelled by futurology's ideas and depictions of a more ideal future. It seemed at times that the powerful wave of exponential technological improvement could deal even with the difficulties of climate change and other collapse-related concerns.

Lately though there has been a ramping up of seemingly exponentially bad news that leads me to think we will never make it to the essential technologies. Moreover, futurology's focus has been a bit more underwhelming the last many weeks. It seems like all the technologies trumpeted here are slightly more dystopian (w big privacy & freedom implications) than utopian.

I'm back in the mindset that we have maybe 10 decent years left, followed by a couple decades of calamitous decline -- wars and more brought on by climate stresses, until society is closer to 19th century rather than 22nd. Am I right?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
36,548
Link Karma
985
Comment Karma
34,965
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Posts updated: 5 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
9 years ago