[UK] Civcraft 1.0 Finglish Law: On Land vs property and the issue of Finglish Sovereignty.

If abuses to the native peoples and their sacred land arise and evil is the charge and the wrong is made known many will want to know who shall be punished for wrongdoing? For the living this is easy and often the greatest fear to the living (beyond public speaking) is to die or loose their life or perhaps in this case "to be pearled". A corporation can not claim land as it is a legal fiction, a virtually dead entity. Otherwise how can one punish a corporation for evil acts against living beings when in fact it is already legally dead. You can not. Why not say what type of behavior this is? A fascist a corporatist and a profiter in a Kleptocracy of the highest order. You certainly can not go about it this way. You must then by design tie the living to the crimes of the dead for are they not guilty themselves as living men that they would allow themselves to be ruled by these corporate zombies.

As the first born son of fingland and a livingstone who has pierced the vale of the digital universe I declare that as it is with me so is it with all Finglishmen. We are the living law and no corporate fiction has any jurisdiction over our rights as sovereigns. You may have property there it may be private but know yo this we own the land and the land is tied to the law and you are under this law.

Had you knowledge of the history you would without cowardice declare your selves sovereigns and under the law of Fingland stand for the right to OWN as men as free men the earth and minerals of where we settle our families heritage from now until Praxis come. This is the oath and testament of the 597 the family of Stonato and all of Fingdom, till praxis come and beyond.

The National Court