Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

401
Any ideas for how to solve Waiting for players?
Image
Comments
[not loaded or deleted]

It's the shipping that kills me.

[not loaded or deleted]

To solve the problem, I must first become the problem

[not loaded or deleted]

I don't think even the hideout preloads. At least, that setting does nothing for me :)

[not loaded or deleted]

Yes. Just log people's average loading times, assign them a value on the NASA to potato scale, then re-check the value every week. Then try to prioritize that in the matchmaking. It won't work every time, but it'll work better. Potatoes won't notice a difference, and the higher-end computers will on average see quicker loading times.

[not loaded or deleted]

Indeed, that's how this thread came to be. Though I'd rather just have less downtime and more uptime in my gaming.

[not loaded or deleted]

Late comers could just be spawned in at any available spawn calculated to be furthest away from a PMC. Problem solved.

[not loaded or deleted]

Yes, I would literally wait

[not loaded or deleted]

I'm much in the same boat, brother. It's baffling how some don't see it either as an issue, or an area ripe for improvement. I'm not married to specifically my thought. If someone has a better one, I'll happily endorse it.

[not loaded or deleted]

Agreed. That's why I want to wait 2.5 minutes, not 4. Or 8.

Also, the game being slow and methodical does not translate into being stuck on the loading screen as part of the experience.

Don't tell me you enjoyed the 30 second countdown over the new 10 second one. Then multiply that several times over and you get waiting for players.

I'm very patient in-game, most raids take at least half an hour. I am not patient outside of the core game, nor should anyone have to be.

[not loaded or deleted]

To be fair, I said four minutes in total. 6 minutes is horrendous, but that doesn't make 4 great 😊

[not loaded or deleted]

I've done that for a thousand raids, not really that much fun to be honest.

[not loaded or deleted]

It's an idea that has only upsides, no downsides. And for those thinking it'd be harder to successfully match make, just make the rule a priority and not a must.

[not loaded or deleted]

Make use of that in-game Tetriz model

[not loaded or deleted]

No, four. For other people it's five, or even ten minutes. The issue and solutions are the same, regardless.

[not loaded or deleted]

"Play another game", the exfil of choice for those filled with more hot air than hot ideas. Much as Tarkov might not be for me, discussion might not be for you. Much love, and may your raids be ever fruitful.

[not loaded or deleted]

No, you would only halve the pool if it's a hard rule. I would make it a priority rule, and if it can't be fulfilled the game skips it and matches spacers and potatoes.

[not loaded or deleted]

To be fair, that's my loading time. In totalt it took four minutes since I had to wait for players.

[not loaded or deleted]

Yes, one idea would be to magically give everyone better hardware...

On the other hand, policy settings for when and how to deploy are a matter of changing a few numbers over at BSG.

[not loaded or deleted]

If my max waiting time on Customs would be up to 7.5 minutes in this example, then that's really an issue. Multiply that by 10 other people, then that becomes a lot of minutes lost where people could be playing the game instead of staring at it.

Ok then, so I'll modify my idea to lower the force deploy to one minute after "waiting for players" initiates. Having one or two players holding up an entire lobby really isn't an optimal solution.

[not loaded or deleted]

I have had queues longer than that, too. Now, can we go back to discussing how things could improve?

[not loaded or deleted]

Ideally, I'd like to optimize the loading, but that's far more complicated than lowering the threshold for when the 'taters can't hold up the game any more. It was mentioned in the thread that the 'tater buffer is currently five minutes. Make it one. If they spawn late, so be it. Have them spawn the furthest possible away from any other PMC, so no one gets a nasty surprise.

If a majority can enjoy the game faster, that's the right move.

[not loaded or deleted]

Say it three times in the mirror and the Vengeful Potatoman comes.

[not loaded or deleted]

From what I hear this did indeed used to be a huge problem, and now it's downgraded to a problem. It's easy to dismiss every load issue by itself, but it all adds up. Especially for those with shorter gaming sessions, spending a larger percentage of their time loading something. Loading the game, loading vendors, loading hideout, loading death screen, loading back to stash. It is an accumulative effect, which seems to have been strangely normalized in some sort of defeatist view - "used to be worse", "it's BSG", "just live with it,"what about bug x that I feel more strongly about". And so on.

I know BSG are not active here. How ever, of course they read what goes on here and take stock of current discussions. That doesn't automatically translate into getting the issue resolved, or even accepted as an issue in the first place, but at least it can be brought up for internal discussions. That's about the only course of action end-users have, and they should exercise it. The nuclear option is to stop playing, but I would argue that most players want to address their issues, not walk away from them. It's a great game. Could be better.

[not loaded or deleted]

I usually go around the loading circle

[not loaded or deleted]

It's my third wipe. I'm sure the same people who think the current state is fine thought that was peachy too. We're moving up in the loading circles of hell. Doesn't make it good, though.

[not loaded or deleted]

Quite! One thing to fix would be quicker loading times ;)

[not loaded or deleted]

Hehe, my brother. While I'm sitting on a overclocked i9, it's five generations old and mobile 😅

[not loaded or deleted]

I suppose I could do, though the closest low ping server is in Mother Potato land.

[not loaded or deleted]

Tetriz of course

[not loaded or deleted]

I have a 1999 retro computer with 120gb IDE drive, that should do it. Or I could put the game on a compact flash-drive.

[not loaded or deleted]

How long the actual wait time is varies wildly between regions and servers, so ymmv. I have quite a clear understanding of what goes on during loading, as I fulfill basic reading requirements and can see what the game clearly states it's doing. It's waiting for other players to catch up.

So you think that when Streets have 20-30 PMC's roaming (exact number in upcoming patch currently unknown. 60 entities total), letting them all wait for one potato is a good time investment for BSG? That's roughly a man hour of time lost per raid, every raid, every day. The more people can actively engage with your game, the better. This is like the most basic concept of game design. You think it's some way to separate the "true" fans from scrubs... Okay, I guess.

Again, you seem to be confusing playing patiently with patiently waiting to load. If you have hours upon hours to burn on loading screens in all your raids put together, good for you. I'd rather cut down on the waiting time and play more.

[not loaded or deleted]

My PC decent gud. Potatoes, not so.

[not loaded or deleted]

How would that help me waiting on other potato cpu's?

[not loaded or deleted]

I'm lol'd and appalled, sir.

[not loaded or deleted]

The matchmaking is done at this point in the process. Now we are waiting for all the potato pc's in the lobby to catch up. For up to five minutes. That's the issue. Choosing more servers is entirely irrelevant at this point.

[not loaded or deleted]

I like that idea. Hell, I'd even take a Tetriz clone mini-game.

Took me about 2.5 minutes to load Customs, then I spent another 1.5 waiting for other players. Anyone got ideas on how that could be solved? Perhaps start the infil if 75% players are ready. Instead of those having to wait for the potato pc's getting ready. Then the potatoes could spawn together in a second infil wave.

Pro's

Less chance of spawnsniping, since not every spawn will be taken

Less waiting, less annoyance

Con's

The playing field becomes uneven

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
3 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
43,924
Link Karma
11,074
Comment Karma
32,850
Profile updated: 1 week ago
Posts updated: 1 year ago
AKS-74UB

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago