Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

4
If economists are bad at finance, maybe economists shouldn't be running the financial sector, no?
Post Body

I'm increasingly worried about the vast disconnect between finance and economics--well, I'm worried about how it's changing my political views.

I used to think that a good academic economist running the Fed was the perfect choice, which is why I opposed Powell's nomination (although it was clearly better than the other names Trump was floating at the time). Now I'm not so sure, and I'm starting to wonder if we need more financiers and less economists in the Fed.

There are two reasons why I'm coming to this point of view. Firstly, it's the bad finance that I see from economists both in this sub and elsewhere. The recent highly upvoted assertion that WMT share prices correlate to recessions is patently absurd to any financier--it's the sort of thing that would get you laughed out of an office at any hedge fund or investment bank. I'm not trying to dog on that particular poster or that event--I've seen bad finance on this sub many times, and even once did a rather highly upvoted R1 on a mod of this sub for a misunderstanding about bonds. The people here, who are very good on economics, clearly don't know finance well enough.

The other is the Fed's constant failure to understand why PCE growth remains so low. In the financial world, there's no real confusion here: monosponistic labor markets, low money velocity, and low money supply relative to assets have all contributed to low inflation. These aren't really big mysteries to most financiers, but after seeing this phenomenon for a full decade, the Fed still hasn't adjusted their models to account for this.

I assume part of the problem is the rigors of academia result in slow change: a thesis needs to be rigorously tested and peer reviewed before it can be accepted, whereas in finance you need to constantly adjust your thesis and the only testing you can do (backtesting) is notorious for its unreliability. And peer review? A good model won't go further than the team working on it.

If economists are bad at finance, maybe economists shouldn't be running the financial sector, no?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
6 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
67,979
Link Karma
19,685
Comment Karma
47,813
Profile updated: 12 hours ago
Posts updated: 6 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 years ago