I conducted two different experiments, by myself, using myself as guinea pig. I did these over the course of many years. One of the experiments had to do with the statistical frequency, geographical spread, and nature of UFO sightings. My thinking went: UFO sightings happened anywhere, happened regularly, and happened bizarrely- some of the behavior being “alien-like”, and some of the behavior being abstraction-like. UFOs were perhaps either aliens or perceptual error. If it was perceptual error, it belonged in the realm of psychology. Curious about what they were, and noting the frequency and spread of sightings, I wondered this: would anyone who determined themselves to go out UFO-watching, every single night, or even regularly, for years and years on end, be guaranteed eventually to see a UFO? Note that, in retrospect, this is similar to asking a question like: does going UFO-watching *cause* UFO-sightings? Try to hold that thought.

My other experiment was at first unrelated, and was about a phenomenon that actually even less was known about: visual hallucination. Visual hallucination was so rare that it was essentially unstudied. I had some questions and wanted to be the first to break ground on the topic. I came up with an experiment that had two components to it: in part it would test whether visual hallucination could be induced in any person. In part it would test whether visual hallucination was actually a form of dreaming: a sort of accident where the brain starts dreaming somehow while the person is awake and has their eyes open. It was the only thing I could guess that visual hallucination was, since it didn’t make sense to me otherwise, mechanically. How could anyone see anything that wasn’t there, looking through transparent and unobstructed eyeballs just like everyone else has? This was primarily a sleep-deprivation experiment: I reasoned that perhaps with enough sleep-deprivation you could get your brain to start dreaming while you were awake.  

First I want to tell you about the UFO experiment, which I had begun in the 2000’s, years earlier than the hallucination experiment, and which I had already had some successes with. My first major success happened after several years of consistent, regular trying. There had been minor successes that I considered indeterminate- maybe a small UFO briefly/far away. Then, in 2010, I had a major sighting, of lots of UFOs, over several nights, some that looked like spheres, some that looked like aerial craft of some sort, and some that looked like large abstractions, up in the woods. Friends with me at the time saw some of it, too. I captured a little of it on video. No question it was whatever “UFOs” are. Up close, it gave me the impression that it was some bizarre phenomenon, and not aliens, and not perceptual error. The forms seemed life-like, but too nonsensical to be likely life-forms. It seemed to be something even more bizarre. I didn’t know what to make of it or how to report it; I didn’t bother at the time. I just kept my notes and video (I had managed to capture a bright light appearing and disappearing in the air on the last night) and kept thinking about it. A friend on this trip who saw a glowing sphere with me, up close, about forty feet away from us and about ten feet off the ground, maybe ten inches wide, that suddenly appeared in mid-air, and then disappeared when we ran toward it, kept saying the same thing about it afterward, that they remembered it and couldn’t explain it. That footage I later lost but I held onto the notes I had made of everything I had seen.  

Some years after this, in 2014, I started running my hallucination experiment. Sure enough, my bet was right on the money. As it turns out, if you stay awake long enough, you do force your brain to dream, “with your eyes open”, and this is visual hallucination; it places dream-images into your field of view, right alongside all the other things you’re seeing. Finally I had explained the mechanism. I was hoping to write a paper on this, for the field of psychology. I decided to first increase the experiment duration though, to try to get an even more dramatic result before I sat down to write. There would still be a question of whether-or-not this was what was going on in the brains of people who have visual hallucination but who are not sleep-deprived. My feeling was that this was going on anyway, but somehow was happening without sleep-deprivation in those people.  

Here, though, as I tried to increase the sleep-deprivation amount, to deepen the hallucination quality and have a little more to write about in my description, I got instead a shocking result- let me explain what I had been seeing so far in my experiment: something like a color spot that would appear in my vision, that had a sort of flat, 2-d look to it, and that I could tell was “in my eyes” or, mind, though it appeared superimposed in the environment, and that would sort of go in and out of looking image-like. What happened one night was that this same sort of color spot, with increased sleep deprivation, instead of expanding, lasting longer, or turning into a more specific form, turned 3-d looking, like it was actually there- not something in my eyes or mind but something in the room. I mean it went from looking like a hallucination, to looking like it was an actual, external, floating hologram, outside of myself, that I could pick up a camera and take a picture of. It was like a little semi-transparent floating orb. It lasted briefly like this and then it disappeared. Certain of my instincts, that I had seen what I thought I saw, I decided to continue this line of research as a project. I wanted to see whether I could make this effect happen again, and capture it on film this time. In the ensuing months and years, I developed a technique to increase the body’s chances of producing this effect, and, I found that I indeed was able to capture these effects, when they occurred, on film. You cannot capture a normal hallucination *on film*; if I was capturing these on film, they were externally visible. Soon I had gotten proof on video that these holograms were mind-produced, when in 2015 I was able to capture one that was of something that obviously was produced by my own subconscious: a representation of the backside of a car that I had been looking at earlier in the day (here is that footage: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTUG021NEhU](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTUG021NEhU). Only the glowing tail-lights of the “car” are visible in the footage because it was taken in the dark and the cell-phone camera over-compensated for the brightness of certain parts of the hologram and dimmed itself automatically; in person, a complete outline of a car was dimly visible around the tail-lights. It was like a glowing, semi-transparent, holographic model of a car, floating in air, absolutely still but sort of shifting over a couple of minutes and then disappearing, located right where the top of a bush was, a few feet away from me, and sort of covering the top of the bush. This hologram lasted a couple minutes and then started to disperse; I caught the tail end of this happening on video. The “car” was about three feet wide, four feet long, and about three feet above the ground; here is a video taken of the exact same spot during the daytime, with a spin-around so you can see the area: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo4N\_TgX4M4](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo4N_TgX4M4). You can see that this was on a small hill with a wall behind it; there’s nothing that could have been reflecting and there’s no way a real car could have been parked in that same spot. This footage is not very clear but I invite anyone to analyze it). It’s difficult to catch these on film because they happen at random times, all of a sudden, and don’t last long. After years of doing this, though, I had observed hundreds of different productions of this effect, many of which were extremely impressive. I compared these all to the entire history of UFO sightings: I found that the catalog of different examples I had made of this effect matched the UFO record, which seemed as well to be divisible into spheres, indistinct forms, and distinct forms, whose shapes and behaviors further matched mine. I found that the spheres were the easiest to do, indistinct forms were a little harder to do and were something of a progression beyond the sphere shape which apparently was the basic form of this, and that, at “max power” of the effect, and most rare and difficult to do, were full-forms, where it looked like a complete, real object, rather than just a sphere or some weird shape. I found that this matched the UFO canon exactly: the UFO record can be divided into incidences of mostly spheres, followed by incidences of “weird shapes”, and most rarely, what are apparently fully-formed images. What I realized was that the technique that I had devised, wherein a person could increase their chances dramatically of producing one of these, was somehow happening anyway, rarely yet regularly, in the normal population. I worked to identify specifically which factors of momentary behavior can cause the “launch” of these effects in a “normal-conditions” person, meaning a person who is not intentionally trying to do one of these, but who accidentally does one.  

There are several factors I found that individually or together can increase the chances of someone doing one of these or that can cause one of these. In general I term this type of effect “**external**” **hallucination** (as I later found, this is a class of effects, of different types, that I have further termed. The effect currently being discussed, which pertains to all “UFOs”, and some other things, I have termed specifically “**external visual hallucination**”, as it is in effect, visual hallucination, *externally*). Here are the **factors** that pertain somewhat to all external hallucinations and specifically to external visual hallucination, and discussions of how they are found in the regular population:

First of all, if the extremely rare effect of external hallucination occurs, it tends to happen **when** or after **a person** **mentally dissociates**, for a relatively long time, often **while** happening to have a **high heart rate and/or blood pressure**. There are mechanical reasons for this which I will discuss later on. “Dissociate” is a term I have had to borrow and modify somewhat for my own purposes. I am using the word as follows: when someone’s thoughts absorb their own attention fully, such that, even though they have their eyes open and are even perhaps performing tasks, they actually have gone momentarily blind to their own sensories, such that, they aren’t really seeing what’s happening, they’re losing track of time, and when they “return” from this state, they won’t have a memory of what they saw while they were thinking or of how long they were thinking for. This can happen quickly or this can go on for a long time. The truth is, everyone actually dissociates every time they think at all. It’s just that it usually happens for so short a time that it doesn’t interfere with anyone’s normal flow of tasks or cause accidents. Usually it’s happening for split seconds, or at most a few seconds. Now, while this is happening, the person also has to be having an unusually high heart rate and blood pressure. Basically when you combine high heart rate/blood pressure with mental dissociation, you are in a configuration for possibly launching an external hallucination, but not guaranteed to do so, it is still a rare chance. Further, there are similar trends that go with and increase the chances if combined, or that can sometimes stand alone to cause these:

Sleep deprivation- sleep deprivation goes hand-in-hand with a technique that requires high heart rate and mental dissociation, because, sleep deprivation does both of these things to you- on one hand, sleep deprivation increases, not decreases, your heart rate / blood pressure, because, your body has to work harder to overcome the fatigue of muscles. If you’re sleep deprived, you will notice that your heart is pumping faster than usual, while you’re being active, as part of keeping you awake and moving. Second, sleep deprivation shortens, dramatically, your short-term memory, because basically your brain is tired. Shortening your short-term memory increases your tendency to dissociate, because you forget what’s going on faster and it increases your propensity to “tune out” and be lost in thought momentarily. Most people are vaguely familiar with “difficulty concentrating” while tired. Without intentionally trying to sleep-deprive oneself, many people regularly get sleep-deprived anyway for various reasons and still show up for work the next day anyway. Someone who’s just had a baby, for instance, is likely to be sleep-deprived for the first couple of years. Someone who is simply stressed, excited, depressed, thoughtful, uncomfortable, or bothered, like by loud noise outside, or like by bed bugs, during the night, can get sleep-deprived. Some people suffer from insomnia which they consider otherwise cause-less. Some people lose sleep from simply having too much work to do and doing it, staying up all night. Some people stay up all night partying, drinking, having sex, and then go in to work the next day without having actually slept. Any sleep-deprivation is one way I’ve found of increasing the chances of accidentally externally hallucinating. The incidence of sleep-deprivation in the regular population is high enough, upon consideration, to be a factor.

The following **emotions** can be said to increase the chances of external hallucination, because, they do the same thing: **excitement, wonder, fear**. Each of these, or combinations, for any reason, will increase heart rate / blood pressure and will increase your dissociation tendency. These can happen to any person at any time, but, for some more often or with more guarantee than for others, for example, anyone undergoing military training exercises. This is one of the reasons why external hallucination incidents are found to happen more often on military bases / ranges than elsewhere; it’s actually because they’re doing exciting and death-defying things on a regular basis, and how those emotions play into the configuring of a person’s body to be in the external-hallucination mode. Also true in warzones.

In general, **extreme physical activity**, exertion, exhaustion, and **variations of exhaustion** like dehydration, hunger/fasting, and muscle fatigue can increase the chance. Activity increases heart rate & blood pressure, exhaustion increases dissociation. When fighter pilots pull high G’s, their incidence is likely raised by blood-pressure spiking.

Belief can also be said to be a factor on its own as I’ve found, meaning, if you are confident that you will see a certain thing, or very curious about seeing a certain thing, this actually helps do it, or can on its own in some cases be enough to do it, especially if many hours are spent trying. What you think you’ll see, or wonder if you’ll see, consciously affects what your subconscious will project.

Here is a discussion on the effects of **pharmaceuticals/drugs**, various, on external hallucination chances. Understand, there are two different hallucination effects: “internal” (regular type) and external, but only one hallucination ability; so, you cannot, at one time, do both at kinds at once, though you can rapidly go from doing one kind to doing the other. The two effects work a little differently and have different causes. So, in general, things that increase the chance of internal hallucination decrease the chance of external hallucination. Hallucinogens, believe-it-or-not, decrease your ability to externally hallucinate, because they make you internally hallucinate. Anything that’s a sedative decreases your ability to externally hallucinate, and may-or-may-not increase your ability to internally hallucinate. Anything that is any kind of stimulant increases your chances of external hallucination. There are some drugs that can be said to make you woozy or drowzy or spaced out, but are not quite sedatives, that may increase your ability to dissociate, and that may work by simultaneously increasing your heart rate while relaxing your muscles, or other ways- if it increases your ability to dissociate it can help with external hallucination. Anything that dilates your pupils will help with internal hallucination, but won’t help with external unless combined with a high heart rate.  

Also, **repeated scanning of the sky** has a propensity to aid EVH, especially over many hours. This is something that anyone in the front seat of an aircraft is likely to be doing, hence their increased effect-successes. It can be similar for people on boats, or, in front of sensor-equipment bays/monitors. Looking through the historical data, it seems that just looking through a monitor of some kind can be enough to launch an EVH in the vicinity, outside of the “visual range” of the person, yet arguably “within” their visual range if you consider that the monitor image, tied to real-world data, is a type of real-world extension of their eyesight. This issue bears some further discussion, but, for now, consider it a possibility.

Here’s a very important point to make- when external hallucination happens, it **gives no feel** at all to the effecting person, no internal indication that lets them know that it happened. If it doesn’t happen at the center of your vision, you have to otherwise notice that it’s happened and know enough to understand what it is and be able to diagnose who “launched” it, whether it was probably you or someone else nearby, based on who was most likely to have, using the info above. Without knowing all this, if you did one, you would have no idea that you had done it. You would just assume it was something else. This is why this phenomenon has gone on so long, historically, without anyone figuring out what it really is. I only figured this out by the accidents of my story first of all, and then by finding ways of increasing the effect to produce it intentionally, and then by studying it a lot. So, if you make one, you won’t feel anything different at all happen in your brain; you’ll have no way of knowing if you’ve just made one, unless it appears at the center of your vision. If it appears anywhere outside the center of your vision, you’ll just have to look around and notice whether or not one of these things is floating around near you.  

External Visual Hallucination Atmospheric Holograms

Definition: EVH is an extremely rare, and difficult-to-produce phenomenon, which can nonetheless happen to anyone under the right conditions, and which regularly happens accidentally, wherein: a person’s brain, sensories, and body stimulate the atmosphere into producing a type of hologram, ranging from base-form spheres to other shapes, determined by the person’s subconscious. These are visible to the person, and to other people, and to sensors. They may reflect or emit various waveforms, or do so at times. These are able to be captured in photographs and on video, including in infrared. EH effects can also interfere with electronics or instruments.

Range: EVH will appear, and then disappear, anywhere within the visual range of the person producing them, and will be visible to that person and any other persons or sensor equipment also within visual or sensor range of the EVH atmospheric hologram (EVH-AH) produced. Consider that, if someone goes outside and looks up, the range and altitude of spots they can focus their eyes on is many miles, and, at night, even further. In general EVH can happen anywhere from inches in front of a person’s face to miles away in the atmosphere, and can scale in size accordingly, from a few inches wide if right in front of you, to a few feet wide starting about ten feet away from you, to tens or even hundreds of feet wide at maximum if far away. EVH-AH seem to be able to form behind or to the side of a person also, outside their direct visual path at the moment but within their visual “range” if they turn their head.

Duration: EVH-AHs can last anywhere from a few seconds to a few hours, but most last under a minute; many last only a few seconds.

Shapes: There are three important categories for visual identification of EVH by shape:

Spheres- These are the base effect of EVH. They can appear as singles or multiples, are relatively small-sized, and will either glow yellow, amber, or orange, or they will reflect opaque white or silvery. They also can sometimes show up in infrared-only, in which case they will be invisible to the naked eye but viewable on an infrared or a regular digital camera, which are somewhat infrared-sensitive.

Indistinct/“Geometric”- Anything that isn’t a perfect sphere, and isn’t a specific recognizable form

either. Any plain shapes, or strange, or hybrid-looking shapes fall into this category. Things that have outline and shading but not distinct features, or that have nonsensical hybrid features. More rare than spheres and the second relative level of the effect. The designs of these are actually subconscious abstractions of, or composites of, plain shapes and regular, every-day objects and sights that the effecting person has seen- a sort of accident of the subconscious. Sometimes these will flash, mimicking airplane lights, even moving similarly (spheres may likewise be an abstraction of the sun or reflections of the sun, stars, headlights, streetlamps and so forth, that you see peripherally/subconsciously throughout your day).

Distinct- Any fully-formed image of any kind qualifies as the rarest category of EVH. Mostly EVH comes in its base form of spheres or in the step above that where the subconscious has started making a sort of image but only gone so far. At max, EVH can be a fully-formed image of some kind that has a complete set of thematic discerning details that stay stable while it’s visible. The give-away for distinguishing them is that they’re nonsensical, something that shouldn’t exist or shouldn’t be floating in the sky, also, that they appear out of nowhere and then disappear into nowhere after seconds to minutes. A building floating in the sky, a giant fish going across the sky, a cartoon character going across the sky, a flying saucer hovering. “Ghost photos” also fall into this category. In the rare instances like this, you are seeing the maximum level of the effect of EVH.

Motions- Spheres, which are the base effect of EVH, will exhibit very clearly at times, three of six different peculiarities of motion that EVH are capable of: 1. Sitting perfectly still at a spot in the air, even with wind blowing. 2. Hovering around at a spot in the air, as if wind were blowing, without wind blowing. 3. Taking off, or abruptly changing course, going nonsensical speeds, about as fast as you can move your own center of vision across the horizon. 4. The “distinct” class can actually display motion consistent with the theme of the image. 5. The “indistinct” class will usually do either a sort of slow and steady float, like a cloud, or: 6. It will do any type of nonsensical, bizarre movement (and/or semi-thematical motions, for half-formed images). Note though that any of the types can do any of these motion patterns.

How to classify and report on events: Observers should try to get footage; people should make sure to keep at least a cell-phone camera with them. Observers should classify EVH events by their shape: sphere-type, indistinct-type, or distinct-type, then, specifically describe the appearance and behavior, and note the duration. Observers should then indicate whether or not, as far as they know, they were the first person in the area who noticed the AH, and, if they were the closest person in the area to it. If someone else saw it first and pointed it out to them, they should indicate that, and who that person was, and that person’s report should also be collected. Everyone in an area where an EVH-AH happened should be interviewed for any effects they may have noticed. If an observer believes that they were the first who noticed it and/or were the person closest to it, then, they may have been the one who effected it, and so: they should then go on additionally to note: everything they can remember about what their mental, emotional, and physical states were like and what they were thinking and doing at the following times: when the event started, just before the event started, during and throughout the event, several hours leading up to the event, and, some general notes in kind about the time frame of several days leading up to the event. They should be asked how much sleep they got on each of the nights before the event. They should be asked if they were on any medications, stimulants, sedatives, or substances of any kind, and how much and how often on that day and the other days. Finally they should be asked how many EVH events they have seen in the past or perhaps done, and what types they were. No one should have any concern about reporting these or about doing these, even multiple times. EVH are normally harmless and can happen to anyone, even to someone who is fully sober and unperturbed, and even to someone who is competently doing their job. Collecting more data will help to verify and to study these further. It is likely that EVH-AH events are under-reported.

National Security Risk- The foremost national security risk that these pose has to do with them being misidentified as plausible, or even as implausible, real-world threats. EVH-AH are subconsciously mind-controlled, albeit, as such, with a sort of lag and latency. The problem with thinking that they are “a real, hostile, alien spacecraft”, or a “real, experimental technology of a hostile foreign nation” is that doing so can modify the behavior of the AH to act more like one of those things, causing the AH to “turn on you” and start chasing the person producing it. A pilot who unknowingly produces, and sees, an EVH-AH, that they think is a hostile UFO, that then turns on them and starts chasing them like it’s a hostile UFO, is at risk of reacting accordingly and stalling and crashing their plane or running out of fuel and having to bail out while trying to out-maneuver it, or, inappropriately discharging their weapons at it. An operator at the terminal of an early-warning radar station is at risk of seeing an EVH-AH on their scopes and thinking it’s an incoming ICBM or ICBMs. It seems EVH-AHs are able to be picked up or locked onto by sensor equipment. A person confronting one should be confident that the EVH-AH will behave harmlessly toward them. Even distinct-type EVH-AHs imperfectly mimic real-world objects; they are easily discernible and they noticeably appear and disappear.

People who are assigned to monitor real risks like those (incoming warheads in sovereign airspace, or, hostile foreign aircraft in sovereign airspace) should keep a short-list handy in their minds of the real-world behaviors of the objects they’re supposed to track, for instantly analyzing whether a blip is likely to be the real thing or is possibly an EVH-AH. For example, real ICBMs should only come from certain directions, i.e. the nations that possess them and would fire them, along certain paths, at certain speeds, and in certain numbers. Operators should be trained not to panic at anything that doesn’t have all of the attributes that it should have if it were the real thing. Similarly, for aircraft, a blip moving nonsensically may be an EVH-AH rather than novel and hostile foreign aviation technology. It should remain a policy to scramble jets to visually approach and confirm unidentifieds.

Everyone who works in such jobs in the military should be told what EVH is. Briefing everyone on what these are will mitigate the risks associated with them, because, at outset the subconscious production of these things is emotionally “neutral”, meaning, they basically don’t do anything other than float around for a few minutes and then disappear, if you understand what they are and therefore react to them emotionally “neutrally”. Make sure to look for the give-away of appearance and disappearance, on sensor scopes or visibly (some ufologists used to think that this was evidence of alien crafts teleporting in and out, or using invisibility camouflage, or travelling to Earth at light speed and stopping on a dime, then taking off again at light speed from a standstill).

How it works- It may turn out that external visual hallucination atmospheric holograms are actually something other than a type of hologram. I will discuss that. If they are what can be called a type of hologram, they probably work like this: the basic principle of holography is beam-splitting and self-interfering. Here is an extremely simplified analogy for those unfamiliar: You take a light beam. You look up close at it. You can see little wave lines going across it, where the actual light waves are. Now you take that whole beam and you split it into two beams, and you send them in different directions. Then, you take them and bring them back together, so that they’re crossing through each other somewhere. You look closely at that area where they’re crossing. Now, where all the little light waves from each of the two beams have crossed each other, there’s an “interference-pattern” where the waves have criss-crossed. What’s special about that interference pattern is that it’s actually a type of readable measurement of how far those two beams travelled away from each other and at what angles. In other words, you have a type of three-dimensional description of what the rest of the system of beams is doing. Now, if you reflect one of the two beams off of an object before the beams cross, you get a three-dimensional description of that object and its location in space, too, along with the rest of the beam info, at the interference pattern. This is not the finished hologram in a holography setup, but, this is how the holographic information is transmitted. In a holography setup, the final step of making the hologram product is to use a piece of special film that can develop interference patterns, and you shine the interference pattern onto that film and develop it; you’re left with a “hologram”. Keep in mind the part about interference patterns and how the information is transmitted.

Now I’m going to show you how I found that the human body might actually utilize holographic principles, which is something that has never been looked for in anatomy. Here’s a short example: Shoot a light beam at the skull. Where the skull has two eyes, that beam will be split into two beams, going into the skull. Behind the eyeballs, that split beam crosses, in the optic chiasm, a piece of the body most people aren’t familiar with that sits between the eyes and the brain and is in the shape of an X. From there it goes into each side of the brain, where, as you know, you interpret these images three-dimensionally, and, you store them and are able to reproduce them, also in 3-d. The brain qualifies therefore as some type of holographic film. The eyes, optic chiasm, and brain may qualify as a beam-splitter, interference-pattern generator, and holographic film. Holography is done with coherent laser light, but perhaps incoming visible light is cohered or “straightened”  within the eyeball, which can be said to have four back-to-back lensing layers when you consider the cornea, the aqueous humor, and the vitreous humor in addition to the lens. Or maybe incoming light is amplified anywhere in the eyes/optic chiasm/brain system, or amplified and resonated, making it coherent somewhere internally. If the optic chiasm’s wires actually cross through each other at all, it’s possible that an interference pattern is generated there for both sides. If it turns out that the optic chiasm has no holographic properties, and is as already described in anatomy as basically just two overlapping wires that do not interact, then the holographic process might be happening entirely in the brain, via the link between the two hemispheres: light from each eye shines into its corresponding brain hemisphere, where each side is also able to shine through into the other hemisphere through the linkage between them, thus interfering in both sides, to put it all simplistically. If the light gets converted to electronic signals or chemical-electric signals in the brain you could look for a corresponding type of interference.  

If something like that is happening, here is how the whole thing can possibly work in reverse, to “develop the air” into a hologram. First of all, appreciate that, when the brain receives information, it’s inputting, but when it replays that information, when it thinks, dreams, hallucinates, it’s essentially outputting that information. Second, appreciate that when you dream, the scenery is often lit to the level of full daylight. Somewhere within the system of your brain, optic chiasm, and eyes, light is being produced, visible within your eyeballs. If your eyes would be open when this would happen, they could be emitting some light, even if a small or reflected amount. Consider the “red eye” effect of pupils in photographs- it’s assumed to be reflected light, but could the pupils be emitting light at all? What about infrared light? What if correlate interference patterns from both sides of your brain are re-emitted back out through the optic chiasm, emitted out the eyeballs in a split-beam configuration, and then converged on a single spot in the air where you are focusing your eyes? If it is a minute amount of interfered-light output, what if it’s a repeating signal, and the atmosphere is actually pumped by this until a hologram is achieved at a certain spot, much like how a laser’s medium is pumped, either electrically or photonically? If the retina is a type of photocell sensor, that takes in light at its front end and gives you electricity at its back end, consider this analogy: a microphone is another type of sensor, that takes in sound at the front end and gives you electricity at its back end. Reversed, it works as a speaker; if you give it electricity at its back end, it’ll put out sound from its front end. Might it be that the retina works the same way? Also, has anyone ever checked whether a retina takes in light at its front and puts out light at its back? It may be that a retina is more like a fiber-optic harness, or like some photosensor that inputs and outputs light. Do you know how, when you close your eyes, there’s sort of a faint, static-like, color-glow to look at, just barely? This may be a “reverse-ouput” from your brain, that turns brighter and focuses output images when dreaming. Perhaps what you’re actually seeing is the front side of your retina, reflecting off the inside of your lens, allowing the image to seem superimposed and focused in front of you.  All these are just some guesses I have about how external visual hallucination would work, holographically, if the product of external visual hallucination is indeed a hologram. Know that no one has otherwise figured out how to produce a “free-standing hologram” that projects into air, or, a “360-degree hologram” that you can look at from all sides, or an opaque hologram, nor are there terms to distinguish such things. Nonetheless, this may be how it’s done; the product EVH-“object” *seems* to be holographical.

If EVH products are better described as purely “**electrical**”, or, “static-electrical”, here is my guess as to what the analogy would be: first, consider this common system: a computer hard drive, wires, and a monitor: image-information stored on the hard drive, is connected electrically through the wires, to the monitor which can display the information. In our case, the air would have to be the monitor, but how would that be? And what would the wires be? Obviously, the brain would be the hard drive. Consider these: air is flouresce-able, if an especial current or discharge is run through it. Air will light up. Most people don’t realize that when they see lightning, they’re not “seeing electricity”; electricity is, at all times and in any amounts, completely invisible. What they’re seeing is the air flourescing from how much voltage is being run through it. Also though they’re observing how much static electricity builds up in the atmosphere. If there’s that much sometimes, how much is there other times? Perhaps enough to play with. Consider also that air rainbows; it prisms, and it can glow the different plasma colors. There would be a way, essentially, to use the air as a “monitor”. Now, what would the “wires” be? Consider that the body is completely conductive; that’s why we can get electrocuted. Consider that the outside of the body regularly becomes even more conductive via sweating. Consider that the body holds static charge, because, you can get static-shocked. Consider that the body’s signals are electrical, even if they’re chemical-electrical/mechanical. Consider that there’s no such thing as a perfect insulator; enough voltage will overcome any resistance, and even if air is normally considered insulative, it’s still anyway a conductor. Yet, air can get ionized, and ionized air is regularly conductive. A final consideration before we tie all these things together- neurons are a type of voltage cell, among other things. You have five billion neurons with 1/3 volt potential each. If they’re all connected to each other, there’s an argument for a possible series, parallel, or series/parallel circuit arrangement, even if there’s usually resistance between each neuron cell. What if, whenever your body needs to react quickly, or is unusually stimulated, the resistance lowers between the cells, opening up a totaled electrical potential? You’d have a lightning bolt’s worth. Even without that much, you’d still have a lot, perhaps enough to power the type of effect I’m describing. So- it would be possible that, I propose: when you dissociate you are essentially boosting the output signal of the brain by fully focusing on thought. If you do it while you have a high heart rate / blood pressure, you’re further boosting the output signal, systemically, because the brain is pumped by your circulatory system. Also, high heart rate / blood pressure make you sweat, increasing your surface conductivity, and, high heart rate / blood pressure may generate a static electric charge on their own due to an internal triboelectric (friction) effect of pumping blood and clenching muscles; perhaps, once this charge is built, and with the skin’s increased conductivity, the air around the body starts to get ionized by the body, becoming conductive. Now, it would be possible to consider that image-information in the brain is circuited electrically to some region of air that is flourescing, fulfilling the hard drive/wires/monitor analogy, and forming the EVH product in the air as a sort of shaped and colored electrostatic ball-lightning, electrically induced by the brain and body. I wonder also if the iron content of the blood magnetizes at all while pumping, perhaps contributing a changing magnetic field to this system.

If you have footage or reports that help to prove that UAP are external visual hallucinations, please share!