Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
Is this argument valid? (About God's existence...)
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Hello, philosopher here. During my lectures we debated the existence of God. I know, the topic is classic but here me out. One person said - commenting on the theleological argument - it is possible that God exists but it is also possible that it does not.

Suddenly something stroke me. Listen to thought that was born in my mind: If it is possible that God does not exist then the God is not the God and therefore it cannot exist. Why? Because we define God as neccessary being. And if neccessary being is not neccessary that it cannot exist, right?

So look at this (1) Assume that my shirt is red (2) Assume that it is false that if my shirt is red then God exists (3) It follows: My shirt can be red and God could not exist (4) Then: God could not exist But if God could not exist, then God would not be God so it is contradiction.

So, if anything fails to prove that God exists, then God cannot exist?

Is it valid or not? What do you think?

Have a great day everybody.

Author
Account Strength
60%
Account Age
2 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,135
Link Karma
45
Comment Karma
1,090
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
11 months ago