This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
Can someone explain the argument here?
Post Body

So this sub doesn't seem to be pro-AI art, but rather recognizes that corporations and small businesses will use AI-art to their advantage at the expense of artists?

I've seen more posts here asserting that resisting AI-art is futile more than genuine enthusiasm around the development of AI-art.

Why disparage artists who are anti-AI art? They see it as a threat to their survival, and their concerns are legitimate.

Artist concerns on this topic are usually dismissed (in my observations, theyre called luddites, reactionaries or some variation of narcissistic) rather than pro-AI art people giving explanations as to how AI art can bolster the artists career/creative wellbeing. Unless of course, the problem here is that AI art can be beneficial to artists, but it won't be implemented in that way because those who control the technology won't let it happen that way?

Author
Account Strength
70%
Account Age
3 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
2,652
Link Karma
1,871
Comment Karma
731
Profile updated: 8 hours ago
Posts updated: 6 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago