Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

2
A Conversation Between Omni-God And Humanity Or Wherefore The Oldest Theological Sources Are Quite Useless
Post Body

Omnipresent Non-human (ON): "You all are not allowed to believe I exist without first listening to these texts proclaiming and arguing for my existence."

Humanity (H): "How exactly do we withold belief in you?"

ON: "These arguments necessarilly prove belief in me is justified."

H: "What if you told us that all those arguments were bunk?  Could we just believe you exist anyway?"

ON: "That doesn't make sense..." (proceeds to read all the texts that were ever written about theism and the existence of omni-God)

H: "What was the point of that?"

ON: "It is important that you believe I, God, exist.  For you can know my invisible features from that which is clearly seen."

H:  "We can see you.  How does that bit of scripture make sense?  You could have shown up.  Told everyone, 'I, God, do not exist.'  Then we would even more easily have found out you do exist."

ON: "These arguments are here to justify your faith in me."

H: "There's just some fundamental break in logic if the one presenting or denying the arguments is a being that meets the definitions of God.  You, God, just existing like anything else, makes those arguments for your existence a big waste of time."

ON: "How so?  Who better to spread the Gospel then I, God?"

H: "One has to wonder..."

  • If anything you type here arguing for God's existence would be an absurd scene for God to present in person, you demonstrate said text was always unnecessary for people to know God exists. Texts are the oldest sources we have for the concept called God in the classical theism sense, texts that we never needed and neither would have a God. So, where do we source the very concept of "God"? Audio and visual recordings from the past 200 years? People still alive no older than 130 years? It's no better than human invention. A God could have disagreed with my premises at anytime before I finished typing them. Either God(s) make a deceptive iron case that they are merely human invention or they in fact do not exist to contradict evidence that they do not exist. I'll wait...

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
4 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
8,235
Link Karma
780
Comment Karma
7,402
Profile updated: 5 days ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago
Anti-theist

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
2 years ago