They're calling it too aggressive, and others are calling it too phallic.

https://pluralist.com/wonder-woman-sword-gal-gadot/amp/

Ok, as cool as it is watching an Amazon warrior swing her sword around, maybe you can make the argument that it's too aggressive. But the shield? C'mon. It's a shield. But ok, maybe it's superfluous because of those gauntlets. Calling the sword phallic though? Seems a little weird that a woman can't hold a sword without people seeing Dr. Manhattan-sized dildo wagging all around. In the original comics, all she had were the gauntlets and the lasso, which the article above calls "yonic". Sure, I appreciate classic comic reverence. But isn't this just assigning gender rolls of passivity to a woman who is supposed to be a hardcore fighter? Do I not understand Wonder Woman as well as I thought? Please discuss.