One of my favorite ideas to ponder/think about and discuss with others with the whole cuck thing is the natural differences between a cuck and a bull. Now I hate the terms in this kink but since there’s no better words for it all, I’ll just use them. One could just say a submissive “weaker” man as opposed to the strong go getters that bulls are

But do you think or agree that bulls just have things that cucks don’t? Or is it just the cuck lacks things a man usually has. Obviously I’m not saying one is more valuable than the other. There are successful cucks and unsuccessful bulls in life, though I feel that those are the exception to the rule

The way I see it is this:

There’s man who’s short/weak/thin, maybe has a small or below average dick, is shy and doesn’t stand up for themselves in the work place or just coasts by

Then there’s a tall handsome man, he’s outgoing, charismatic, he gets what he wants because he puts the work in and he’s outgoing, he’s amazing in bed and women hear about it through their gossip.

If you have these two men standing together, I’d say it’s more than likely that most women will pick the second guy as opposed to the first because he just seems like the better option. Whether it’s as a provider or sexual partner or whatever.

Obviously these are tangible assets and generalizations, and the reason cucks do get married and sometimes to beautiful women (such as myself) is because love is a thing. A cuck can be good looking and funny or whatever but there’s the overall picture of everything put together.

It’s about the overall picture. I know I’m generalizing a lot here but I feel like there is a lot of truth to all this. What are your thoughts on the natural implications of a cuck vs a bull?