While the conflict persists, I believe it is my duty to express my opinion on the matter. Very plainly, war qualifies as intimidation. For, if we are to maintain a brave society on Civcraft for our forebears, then we must refrain from intimidation. Whenever we interact with another player, our actions should be brave.

The presently embraced alternative to bravery is intimidation. If one resorts to intimidation to achieve one's goal(s), then one is tacitly confessing imbicility. For one who employs it against someone else would no doubt convince the other of one's argument if one could.

Rather, intimidation is presently chosen, because their arguments are weak. In the anti-Bravist process of intimidation, they are unconsciously agreeing that intimidation is the surest way of settling conflicts. It certainly is not. Intimidation and the threat of intimidation can never solve any human problem. Nothing permanent was ever solved by intimidation.

The alternative is the Brave society, which adheres to persuasive processes and maintains an epistemological bias against intimidation. I call upon those presently at war to put away their swords and bows and resolve their conflict in a brave manner.

Yours in Bravery, The Czar of Dance