I have read through both the constitution and penal code and have determined that dathompi is currently illegally pearled.

From the constitution: "The due process may involve multiple parties:

The speaker (only in certain cases)

7 randomly selected citizens

The BoD

The prosecution

The defence"

none of these were involved, other than the BoD, therefore my client was not given a fair trial.

also: "cases will only be brought before the speaker if there is insufficient evidence"

There is not enough evidence to convict my client of attempted breaking and entering or any real griefing, so clearly the speaker must be involved in this case.

Then theres a long paragraph about how the courts are meant to work...that was completely ignored.

Next lets look at the penal code; The crimes listed on the penal code are "griefing, theft, murder, harassment, kidnapping and conspiracy"

The only one he can even remotely be convicted for is griefing which has a penalty of "3 days to 1 month". Now clearly what he did was extremely minor, but yet he is being imprisoned for half the maximum term, which is what someone who burned down half the town would get.

These all show that Dathompi has been imprisoned illegally and should be freed for now.

I say that a full trial should be convened at the earliest possible moment. I will act as the defence for the accused. Will whomsoever is responsible for acting as the prosecutor and the judge please contact me so that we can arrange for this to be done soon?

oh, also I believe the american constitution states 'you shall not hang a man for the same crime twice'. I realise that this may not be considered a valid point in this case, however I hope all you folks from the colonies bare this in mind when mentioning my clients past crimes.