After reading the thread from feminists where they were complaining how circumcision affects sex for them & how a lot of the women were comparing cut and intact men and how intact men “glided” better, it finally hit me why certain things were in the Bible.

Back in the day couples didn’t have sex until marriage and divorce was frowned upon. Widowed wives were expected to remain widowed and farmers would give some of the crop to them because they were unemployable. Back then, if a woman cheated she was stoned to death. Men that cheated divorced and remarried. But the main idea is that women were only able to experience one dick, their husbands, their whole life. That dick was circumcised and that’s all they knew. So they probably thought sex was rough and hurt a bit but their duty was to produce offspring.

Nowadays women have many partners and even in a cutting culture if she has enough partners she’s bound to have an intact guy at some point. So now the secrets that religious leaders knew but had been keeping secret from the public are now common knowledge to any woman with any kind of common sense. On that that thread some of the women hadn’t put two and two together, they thought it was the guy not his intact dick but when they realized it was an “ah” moment.

Also back then homosexuality was a sin punished by stoning as well, so you don’t have what you see here where cut dudes have experiences with intact dudes and find that the intact dude feels a lot more.

Even 20 years ago there were no videos of circumcisions available. Now there are male and female circumcisions (some guy just posted both in his post) posted on YouTube regularly. When I was born the internet didn’t even exist. People went on advice of the doctor, who was corrupt.

So I think it’s just a matter of time before the circumcision rate drops extremely low. I’m talking maybe 5-6 years for newborns. It will take longer for the average to get lower because older cut men will have to die off.

Discussion ?