So I don’t know if anyone has read Harry’s autobiography “Spare”. In it he says that there were rumors he and his brother were intact but it was a royal tradition to circumcise the royal babies. Diana was anti-circumcision but the (late) Queen ordered that they be circumcised in accordance to tradition and so it was done.

He mentioned that he went to the North Pole and got frost bitten at the end of his penis and said if he would’ve had a foreskin it would’ve protected his head and kept it warmer.

Any thoughts on this? This story kind of reminds me of that Florida woman that wanted to keep her son intact but her husband wanted him circumcised and the judge ordered that he be circumcised.

Anytime there is a debate they always err on the side of circumcising.

Thoughts?