Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

5
Wiley question that doesn't make sense to me
Post Body

"Johnson Co. had a current ratio greater than 1:1 and a quick ratio less than 1:1. Which of the following transactions will result in a DECREASE in the current ratio and a DECREASE in the quick ratio?

I. Collected accounts receivable

II. Made a sale on account

III. Purchased inventory on account

IV. Purchased supplies for cash"

I picked III and IV but it said the correct answer was III only. Which makes sense if IV was purchase of inventory for cash. But in many/most real industries, "supplies" are expensed to factory overhead as a period cost when purchased. So that would decrease the current asset side of both Current and Quick ratios.

Why would Wiley call something "supplies" if it was going to be inventoried instead of expensed immediately, especially after using the term "inventory" in the previous line? Is this confusing to anyone else?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
7 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
5,305
Link Karma
313
Comment Karma
4,957
Profile updated: 1 day ago
Posts updated: 1 month ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
6 years ago