This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
"Johnson Co. had a current ratio greater than 1:1 and a quick ratio less than 1:1. Which of the following transactions will result in a DECREASE in the current ratio and a DECREASE in the quick ratio?
I. Collected accounts receivable
II. Made a sale on account
III. Purchased inventory on account
IV. Purchased supplies for cash"
I picked III and IV but it said the correct answer was III only. Which makes sense if IV was purchase of inventory for cash. But in many/most real industries, "supplies" are expensed to factory overhead as a period cost when purchased. So that would decrease the current asset side of both Current and Quick ratios.
Why would Wiley call something "supplies" if it was going to be inventoried instead of expensed immediately, especially after using the term "inventory" in the previous line? Is this confusing to anyone else?
Post Details
- Posted
- 6 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/CPA/comment...