Updated specific locations to be searchable, take a look at Las Vegas as an example.

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

15
Kirby chose his words very carefully when he said "we don't look ahead" - which is why OSU will be #5 next week with a PSU win regardless of the outcome of Clemson/Washington
Author Summary
farzyness is in Washington
Post Body

A lot of people are taking what Kirby said on today's show at face value without taking into account the impact of this week's upcoming games. I think when people are thinking about the context of Ohio State in the playoff, they are completely ignoring the fact that there's an additional # in the W column that will completely re-shift the rankings.

Let's start with the Week 13 Top 10 rankings that were just released:

  • 1. Alabama (12-0)
  • 2. Ohio State (11-1)
  • 3. Clemson (11-1)
  • 4. Washington (11-1)
  • 5. Michigan (10-2)
  • 6. Wisconsin (10-2)
  • 7. Penn State (10-2)
  • 8. Colorado (10-2)
  • 9. Oklahoma (9-2)
  • 10. Oklahoma State (9-2)

As it stands to date, these rankings are extremely justifiable. Alabama is in its class of its own as the only undefeated P5. Ohio State has the strongest resume of any 11-1 team. Michigan has the strongest resume of any 10-2 team.

I think the key thing most people are missing is that the Conference Winner, H2H, and other tiebreakers are IN ADDITION to the benefit of playing an extra game. Let's assume the following scenario:

  • Alabama beats Florida
  • Clemson beats VT
  • Washington beats Colorado
  • PSU beats Wisconsin
  • Oklahoma beats Oklahoma State

Now check out the list with the updated wins and losses:

  • 1. Alabama (13-0)
  • 2. Ohio State (11-1)
  • 3. Clemson (12-1)
  • 4. Washington (12-1)
  • 5. Michigan (10-2)
  • 6. Wisconsin (10-3)
  • 7. Penn State (11-2)
  • 8. Colorado (10-3)
  • 9. Oklahoma (10-2)
  • 10. Oklahoma State (9-3)

Here's where Ohio State's drop begins due to the chairman's logic of ranking teams based on clear separation and then applying tiebreakers. As it stands if the above were to happen, Clemson and Washington should be ranked above Ohio State due to a better W/L record and a conference championship. Penn State will jump both Michigan and Wisconsin due to the same exact logic. The resulting rankings should look as follows:

  • 1. Alabama (13-0)
  • 2. Clemson (12-1)
  • 3. Washington (12-1)
  • 4. Ohio State (11-1)
  • 5. Penn State (11-2)
  • 6. Michigan (10-2)
  • 7. Wisconsin (10-3)
  • 8. Oklahoma (10-2)
  • 9. Colorado (10-3)
  • 10. USC (9-3)

Now it's here where I believe that Ohio State can no longer claim clear separation due to the following:

  • Both teams would've beaten a ranked, quality opponent in Wisconsin.
  • The argument of Ohio State beating Michigan, which was a team that beat PSU by 30 early in the season, would no longer hold water as a) PSU will have the same # of wins as OSU and one more than Michigan b) Penn State finished the season going 4-0 making easy work of Iowa, Michigan State, Rutgers, and Iowa, one of which beat Michigan (Iowa) and two others that gave Ohio State and Michigan a good challenge (Indiana and MSU, with MSU almost beating OSU), which Michigan finished the season 2-2.
  • A Conference Championship for PSU
  • A Head to Head for PSU

Because of this, I feel pretty strongly that PSU will jump OSU for the #4 spot and will be a lock for the CFP if it takes care of business. Ohio State will get in if either Clemson or Washington lose. If both Washington and Clemson lose, I believe Colorado will jump Michigan using the same logic above to be the #4 seed behind PSU and OSU.

Fire away!

EDIT: A bunch of crappy stupid typos.

Comments

He said that Ohio state and Penn state did not have similar resumes last week. Between that statement and selection Sunday, Ohio state will have added a win over number 5. Penn state could add a win over number 6. If they weren't close before that, why would they be after it?

If head to head and conference championships are a tiebreaker between teams with very similar resumes, they aren't even coming into play.

[not loaded or deleted]

Ah yes, the great equalizer is beating a 3-9 team

[not loaded or deleted]

Their win over number 5 Michigan?

I'm saying that since Hocutt made that statement before the game, that is what changed on their resumes. Not actually this week.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
12 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
24,543
Link Karma
12,384
Comment Karma
11,977
Profile updated: 23 hours ago
:pennstate: Penn State

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
7 years ago