There's a sticky regarding the US elections right now at the top of MR: link and current snapshot

I've made slight formatting changes, adding bold, breaking up awful block text into paras or bullet points, and I've excerpted many of the longer comments.

It's just, bad, bad all over. We have bad politics, bad economics, bad social science, bad fallacy, bad religion, bad history, bad science and bad women's anatomy. It's just an amazing shit show, and there's so much I haven't even included. I couldn't even provide comments for large portions of it because I was laughing too hard, and every time I try and write something, all that comes out of my brain is "wut".

Complaints that AVFM is not male friendly anymore:

AVFM has changed and is not as activist nor as male friendly anymore. It seems that any ranting about women is verbotten now. They do not want to upset their many female moderators.

Ranting about women is not what the MRM is about. That's the equivalent of most feminist sites out there complaining about the death of chivalry and how they were oppressed when a man they didn't think was attractive asked them out, and then finally complaining that no men have the balls to ask them out.

Aside from the fact that this is total bullshit and AVFM is still a horid place, holy falsy equivalence batman. Being man friendly != bashing women. And lol, this poor person replying who thinks that the MRM is somehow the male version of feminism.

Policy suggestions:

• Force states to require child support recipients to provide an accounting of how the child support is spent, and require them to pay back child support that isn't spent on the child's needs.

• Examine the history of a judge's custody rulings for signs of gender bias.

• Examine the duration of incarceration for males vs. females in states for inmates with similar charges, take steps to equalize the rulings.

• Examine living conditions in female prisons vs. male prisons, provide funding incentives based on how equal the living conditions are.

• penalize police departments that show a larger response history to calls from females about domestic violence vs. calls from males.

Yes, funding incentives based on how equal the living conditions are, not how safe or good. Because who cares what the living conditions are like as long as men and women are equally miserable. It's time to institutionalise a race to the bottom!

And equal numbers of responses to male and female DV victims! More women calling? Don't show up. More men calling? Don't show up. Things must be EQUAL!

Economics:

There is an unpleasant fact confronting us: thanks primarily to the choices of Chinese and Indian (India-Indian) families, the generation that started coming of age about 5 years ago is confronting a global shortage of fecund women. During the next 10 years or so this will ripple around the world as men travel in search of wives. This will raise the "market value" of women, and with it, female power.

and about women's worth on the "sexual market" as my dad would say, I see the opposite as well, I believe this latest batch of feminism that has arisen since the mid two thousands, but really kicked into gear in the last 3 years or so is one of women's last fights to try their hardest to keep the "value" of their reproduction/sex as high as possible, they're basically trying to create a market bubble.

Freedom and liberty are fundamental to the existence of humans qua human. Arguments that we should take that away from women because human nature will lead them to make choices you don't like is the slipperiest of slopes that is shared by many religions, especially progressivism and including feminism, and if adopted would ultimately lead to totalitarianism and tyranny.

Ths is one of the places where my brain when "wut". So many bad ideas competing here.

Healthcare:

Interconnect the issues. For example, medical marijuana. Bring up how men statistically are more likely to develop testicular or even breast cancer than women, men are more likely to experience chronic depression, (no doubt divorce playing a big part) marijuana is a man's issue to alleviate diseases that go ignored.

Good. I like that. That is why I'm working closely with the Rand Paul crowd to battle the establishment aka big feminism.

While yes, I agree that men are more likely to develop testicular cancer, men are not more likely to have breast cancer or to have depression:

Lifetime breast cancer stats for women: 1 in 8 U.S. women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer. Lifetime breast cancer stats for men: 1 in 1,000 men men (.001%) (doesn't specify whether invasive breast cancer or not) source

And according to the CDC, 6.7 girls and women over the age of 12 have depression while only 4.0 of boys and men do.

Not that I'm not pro-marijuana legalisation, I am. But if you want to fram weed legalisation as a men's issue, you should use arrest and conviction rates or something, not made up health statistics.

Not sure why it needs to be framed as a "men's issue" to begin with, but whatever.

How to influence the election:

Ask candidates the tough questions:

"After conception women can take The Morning After Pill, Get an abortion or unilaterally put the child up for adoption. That is three options for women to legally surrender parental obligations. >What options for Legal Paternal Surrender should be available to achieve gender equality?"

Yes, candidates, please, tell me what you'll give me so I can be equal with women because they get to control their bodies and stuff.

Vote:

Here's an idea: vote the straight GOP ticket. Every time. I don't even like them. Fuck, I don't even like democracy. But it needs to be done, at least as a temporary stop-gap so we don't get fucked over even more by the State.

....

Vote. If you can't vote for the best pro-male candidate then work on defeating the misandrist one. Vote like your ass is on the line because it is. Vote-I cannot emphasize that enough.

Misaaaaaandrrrryyyyy!!!

And of course, the final solution - it's time to drop the bomb:

Actually, we can influence the election as a spoiler. We need to find Congressional districts in which feminist, or feminist friendly candidates are running for office, and use the Agent Orange files to show them what "real feminism", looks like.
The Agent Orange files have not been used to or utilized to their full extent and should be.

EDIT: For those of you blissfully out of the loop, the Agent Orange files are just a bunch of MR doxxes of feminists. WHTM links: 1, 2.

Because feminists are supervillains. If you reveal their real identities and contact information, so that a bunch of creeps can harass them and send them death threats, feminism will revealed to be....I dunno, evil?