Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

4
Residuals as predictors in autoregressive path models
Post Body

Hi there!

I'm currently in the process of figuring out how best to evaluate changes in three factors from one time point to the next (measured 6 months between) in a cross-lagged path model. In addition, one variable was measured 6 months prior to the two primary measurement waves. The study is openly exploratory, as little is known about the relationships we are exploring from earlier research. The variable names are substituted for surrogate concepts - so do not cite me on these models.

The thought was to control for the covariance between each factor at time point 1, and evaluate whether these factors predict changes in one another beyond that initial covariance.

As far as I can tell, allowing exogenous factors (T1 = Timepoint 1) to covary does not take into account their covariance when predicting the factors at a later time point? See the path model here.

Well, I think I may have gone rogue - but if the SEMbuilder in Stata does not allow to control for initial covariance in later prediction, I thought it might be worth the shot to do it myself.

So I used the regress-command for each of the three T1-variables, with Injury (T0), and the other two variables as predictors, to generate a residual score for each variable - which should then be free(r) of confounding from the initial covariation (?). Using these residual scores as T1-variables to predict later scores should do what I want, right?

Lo and behold, the following model is produced. The correlation between the variables at T0 and T1 is now 0, and the model supports more temporally dynamic relations between the concepts.

But I am sure there is something very basic I am misunderstanding here. Does the latter approach have an established use or name? Anyone more knowledged willing to comment on which of the procedures seems correct for predicting change from one time point to another?

Thanks for any and all help in advance!

Author
Account Strength
80%
Account Age
11 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
207
Link Karma
169
Comment Karma
38
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Posts updated: 1 year ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
2 years ago