I won't comment on the Slay News being the source... But even so, I am very technical. There is a big difference between something having vulnerabilities and actually having been violated.

People counting ballots are also a very vulnerable method and there are plenty of articles written about boxes of votes being thown away, misplaced, etc...

So I'd suggested we tighten up the electronic vulnerabilites, but that is possible, where as tightening up the people counting is not...

interesting - why do you trust people counting paper ballots vs. electonic voting? you trust the bank with your money being electronically managed? The others I like!

Another good one. I support states rights to be different, but when it comes to voting for National elections (not local ones) the rules should be consistant.

I agree - today we all have access to an unlimited amount of information and the ability to vote. we don't need a smarter group to vote for us.

I also think the concept of a state needing to be all or nothing (or even 3 out of 4 votes) for a candidate is wrong. Movement between states is 100x maybe more than it was when the country was founded. Each vote should stand on it's one and the total popular vote winner should be the winner!

totally love this one - i think it's the second biggest issue with politics in the US!

yeah, but that's a freedom of speach thing - so I'm not sure that is the answer. we all have to be smart enough to decipher the truth from the lies we see, read, hear!

This is certainly an option to improve things - I just think there are bigger ones to be attacked first!