This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
So let me set up a premise I'm under the impression we believe the universe is expanding and the farther away an object is the faster its retracting from us, we know this because of the light from distant objects stretches with space so we get red shift.. but light is subject to a doppler effect, as well as gravity in addition to the suspected expansion so how could we expect with any certainty to know how distant stars truly are if we dont know exactly the ratio of much redshirt is due to gravity, universal expansion, and the doppler effect. If were off even a little on the cause and original intensity(by little I mean lightyears) doesnt that make it exponentially more likely to be inaccurate?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 2 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/...