Updated specific locations to be searchable, take a look at Las Vegas as an example.

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

7
Are DAC and MAC just strategies or actual implementations like RBAC?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I'm currently writing my bachelors thesis about the different approaches for authorization. Before I explain the actual implementations of RBAC or ABAC i want to explain DAC and MAC. But in various papers i find pretty much conflicting information.
Most of the times I read that DAC and MAC are just strategies on which acutal implementations are built on. DAC means the subject/owner decides what to do with their rights to a object and MAC implements System-Wide policies which the end-user cannot control.
So far so good, but on multiple occasions I read "Bell-LaPadula is a implementation of MAC" and "[...] MAC is a better implementation than ABAC [...]".
Furthermore I couldnt find any example definition of an actual MAC implementation, which further emphasised, that MAC cannot be implemented on its own.
I also found that multi-level-security being used synonymusly with MAC, but I was under the assumption, that MLS adds the Classifactions and Clearances and builds upon MAC.
I hope someone could get me some insight what DAC,MAC and MLS actually are. Even better if you could give me a source which I can cite :)

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
7 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
7,572
Link Karma
7,105
Comment Karma
287
Profile updated: 1 day ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
7 months ago