Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

260
Were the atrocities of Vietnam era US Forces as widespread as portrayed?
Author Summary
ElboDelbo is in Vietnam
Post Body

I served in Iraq and saw my share of bodies. Never had an urge to cut a finger off of one of them. And I have known plenty of Vietnam veterans. Hard to imagine the old grandpa type as a guy with a necklace of human ears.

But it seems that whenever you read a work set in Vietnam, there's always someone collecting ears, raping villagers, or fragging their commanders. Obviously these things are heightened for dramatic purposes, but the perception remains. I know that atrocities in war are as old as war itself, so I'm not naive enough to believe it NEVER happened (Mai Lai happened, after all)...but was it as widespread as depicted?

Edit: I'm referring to smaller scale "personal" atrocity, not policy decisions like bombing the shit out of Cambodia. Not that these types of things aren't atrocities or war crimes, but I'm talking about the actions of individual soldiers and platoons, not upper level campaign decisions.

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
2 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
313,315
Link Karma
40,569
Comment Karma
272,746
Profile updated: 5 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
9 months ago