Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

12
What were the arguments for the Treaty of Versailles?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

The Treaty of Versailles after the end of World War I has been criticized as a contributing cause of World War II. It humiliated the German state and fueled the "stab in the back" myth later wielded as propaganda by factions such as the Nazi Party. Even before it came into effect, the treaty was criticized by people like Supreme Allied Commander Ferdinand Foch, who is quoted as saying, "This is not peace. It is an armistice for 20 years".

There must have been some debate at the time about the possible effects of the treaty, exemplified by Foch's prophetic remark. How do we explain that it still came into effect in its final, disastrous form?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
11 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
27,069
Link Karma
21,577
Comment Karma
5,298
Profile updated: 5 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 months ago