Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed (Author was flagged for spam)

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

67
How accepted is the "Mongol Yoke" thesis of Russian political institutions by modern historians?
Author Summary
Hoyarugby is in Russia
Post Body

The classic theory about political institutions throughout Russian history is that of the "Mongol Yoke" - the idea that Muscovy, the progenitor state to the Russian Empire, USSR, and modern Russia was founded on the basis of essentially being a tax/tribute collector for the Mongols/Tatars. This created Russian political institutions that were autocratic and not checked by competing institutions, such as the church or nobility or merchant classes, because the state could always call on the superior might of the Mongol military to crush threats to its power

Even after the Mongols/Tatars were diminished or defeated, the Russian state retained this arbitrary, autocratic character through the eras of Tsarist absolutism and Soviet totalitarianism, to the modern Russian security state

This is a classic theory about Russia that I have heard, but how much is it accepted by modern historians? Like so many classic theories, has it been debunked or cast aside in academia?

Author
Account Strength
0%
Account Age
13 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
312,445
Link Karma
35,091
Comment Karma
271,836
Profile updated: 5 months ago
Posts updated: 2 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago