Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
When agreeing to invade Italy in 1943, we're allied commanders unaware of the difficulty of advancing in rocky terrain? Was the decision to go forward motivated by a desire to stretch the Germans or to ensure post-war control of Italy?
Author Summary
Smithersandburns6 is age 19 in Italy
Post Body

Winston Churchill famously referred to Italy as the soft underbelly of Europe, and strongly advocated for Italy as a target for the allies to reestablish a foothold in Europe. In reality we know that while allied forces were largely superior to Italian troops and that the allied invasion contributed to the collapse of Mussolini's regime, the rapid transfer of German troops and the narrow, rocky geography of Italy contributed to the allied advance being slowed or even stopped for months at a time.

Obviously the geography of Italy was well understood when the planning was being conducting. Did planners assume that allied superiority would be such that these obstacles would not pose a major problem? Did they underestimate the speed and ability of the Germans to form a defensive position in Italy? Was the decision motivated by a desire to take pressure off the Eastern Front and/or a desire to ensure that Italy did not fall under the control of communist leaning partisans?

Author
Account Strength
50%
Account Age
1 year
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
3,559
Link Karma
650
Comment Karma
2,909
Profile updated: 4 days ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

Location
Age
19
We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago