This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Let's say there's a shortage of housing relative to demand in Venice, Italy (there probably is), so developers tear down a lot of historic buildings to build ugly modern high-rise flats. Suddenly the housing shortage is eased but Venice is no longer what it was and the new buildings are completely out of step with the surroundings.
As well as being a shame in its own right, could this not reduce tourism and spending in Venice which would do more harm than good to the city? And wouldn't this suggest that some building restrictions are economically beneficial?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 5 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/AskEconomic...