Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

1
Should first and second opinion talk?
Post Body

This is more of a question about medical procedure rather than a question about a condition (if there's a better sub, please let me know).

1) I've been having a persistent condition that hasn't responded well to treatment. I've gotten second and third opinions. The decision on how to proceed has been split and very different. I asked my first opinion provider why his course of treatment might be so different from the second opinion provider, and whether it was worth them discussing. The first opinion provider said that it's a breach of standard protocols to contact with each other when patients are trying to get second and third opinions. Is this true? The third opinion basically said this was BS.

Age: 29 Sex: M Height: 5'10" Weight: 155 Location: USA

(Second unrelated question)

2) I asked that first doctor for his opinion about something via email. The question was "why am I not progressing". They said it is against best practices for doctors to offer advice to patients without the opportunity to physically examine them. This also seems off to me as well. Is this actually standard policy?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
10 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
7,650
Link Karma
3,880
Comment Karma
3,602
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Posts updated: 3 days ago
Layperson/not verified as healthcare professional.

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
4 years ago