Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

25
Is this unethical?
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

Hi everyone, I submitted my manuscript for publication in a journal in November last year. The paper underwent the initial screening by the editor and was sent to reviewers to be reviewed. I haven't heard from the journal since my paper's status went to "under peer review" in December last year, so I decided to go check the paper's status and it had changed to "Review Overdue." I reached out to the Editor through a discussion forum on the journals website and through email to ask for clarifications on what this new status meant. I am presuming my paper has been forgotten, it's been 7 months and no information from them.

It's been 3 weeks and I have still not receive any communication from the journal. So now I am deciding on writing to the editor to cancel my submission so I can submit elsewhere. I need advice on this matter as it sounds unethical to me but given the circumstances I honestly believe this is the only way if I want to publish my work. Should I proceed by withdrawing my paper or I should wait some more? If it helps, the journal recently published an issue and their previous issue was published 2 months after I had submitted my paper.

Thanks in advance.

Author
Account Strength
50%
Account Age
1 year
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
962
Link Karma
117
Comment Karma
845
Profile updated: 1 day ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
5 months ago