Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

1
Secondary sources
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I am writing a medical research article and I don't have much experience. I am a bit confused about the concept of secondary citations. As expected, every paper I need to cite will have its own references for the same piece of information I want to cite. Most of this information is well-known in the medical community. Do I have to go and read those references every time to make sure they have been cited correctly and then cite them directly? Does this mean everyone will end up citing the original sources as it is not recommended to cite a recent paper without checking and citing its older references? Hope this makes sense!

Author
Account Strength
50%
Account Age
2 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
17
Link Karma
11
Comment Karma
6
Profile updated: 4 days ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
8 months ago