Quasi-Anarcho-Capitalists?

As some of you are likely aware, I'm not one to "tow the party line" of Anarcho-Capitalism. Sure, I advocate property and non-government, but the idea that implies I an entire ideological belief system or identity seems a like a bit if a stretch. Perhaps part of the reason for this, is my history of caution towards any "package deals" which include things like labels, identity, stereotypes, and belief systems. I've never considered my identity to be that of an AnCap, though I've occasionally said "I am" as a communication or linguistic tool.

As I see it, "propertarian anarchism," or the concepts of individual-property and autonomy from rulers, doesn't necessarily imply Anarcho-Capitalism as it exists today. Flaws, don't nessecarily imply shifts towards leftism either.

Thoughts / Questions / Discussion

I have my own list of critiques and ideas, but my intent for this topic is to leave it wide open for others to voice their thoughts and observations. Feel free to take this topic whatever direction you wish, but here's a few starter questions:

• If you were to give AnCap-ism a reboot, what would you change? What would you caution against?
• What are the biggest holes or blindspots in AnCap-ism?
• Do you feel AnCap-ism should adopt, abandon, or change any particular positions or ideas?

P.S. Also, to keep this focused...

• This topic isn't asking "what competing ideology would you replace AnCap-ism with"
• This topic isn't asking for insults or attacks on AnCap-ism. Please keep comments and responses civil.
• Inevitably, some criticisms "at AnCaps" doesn't necessarily mean "all AnCaps"