Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

2
Chapter 113 / CXIII - “The Past” reading discussion
Post Body

  1. The count characterizes Mercédès as having been unfaithful… on the one hand, so does Mercédès, in the previous chapter (“The Departure”); on the other hand, aren’t they both being unfair to her?

  2. The count struggles here with whether Édouard’s death essentially invalidates his entire post-incarceration life’s purpose, but how should we view the count when he squelches his doubt with a presumed sign from Abbé Faria—even though Faria strongly opposed harming innocents?

  3. Does the chapter title, in its grandiose attempt to so neatly contain the past, reflect the count’s own naïve assumption that the past can be sealed off so hermetically? (At the risk of overusing the relevant sentiment from Faulkner: “The past is never dead. It’s not even past.”)

Final sentence of chapter:

“Shortly afterward the boat set out, and an hour later, as Monte Cristo had said, the same trail of smoke was barely visible streaking an eastern horizon darkened by the first shades of night.”

previous chapter discussion

Author
Account Strength
90%
Account Age
9 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,570
Link Karma
507
Comment Karma
1,063
Profile updated: 6 days ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago
French version

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago