Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

3
Chapter 52 / LII - “Toxicology” reading discussion
Post Body

  1. The count is a masterful manipulator, twisting the definitions of “poison” and “conscience” to bend Madame de Villefort to his will… did anyone else initially wonder whether he was gaslighting her by planting a false memory of an encounter in Perugia? (Assuming the encounter did actually happen—which seems more likely—why does Dumas choose to present it through the count’s memory?)

2) The count details a very specific chain of poisoning from prey to predator; is vengeance a metaphorical poison? (And do you think the count has contemplated whether he is [or will be] part of a chain of vengeance?)

3) Does Madame de Villefort’s explicit acknowledgement of the tension between being a woman and being passionate about science strike you as forward-thinking or lazy on Dumas’ part?

Final sentence of chapter:

“The next day, as he had promised, he sent the recipe she had asked for.”

previous chapter discussion

Author
Account Strength
90%
Account Age
9 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,570
Link Karma
507
Comment Karma
1,063
Profile updated: 1 week ago
Posts updated: 8 months ago
French version

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago