Updated specific locations to be searchable, take a look at Las Vegas as an example.

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

1
Trying to reduce filament in a large piece that needs to be strong, but putting holes in it does not decrease filament.
Post Flair (click to view more posts with a particular flair)
Post Body

I am trying to print a cuboid which is 3cm tall, 6cm deep, and 25cm wide.

It will be supporting a static load that is not really that heavy but for a long term.

So of course I started by making a cube for it, setting all walls up to 5 and infill to 25% for strength but that was a lot of filament. So I tried poking holes in it with negative shapes, cones, spheres, etc and while they overall decreased the filament used even the largest ones had a big tradeoff where the filament used in the new walls really cut into any benefit from the lack of infill area.

I would've needed some very big holes in it.

I have ran into this before so I am wondering. Due to the nature of how FDM works does that mean that in simple shapes putting holes in them is not really going to decrease filament much?

If you wanted to dramatically decrease filament but still hold up a static load in roughly the original rectangular shape what would you do?

Author
Account Strength
90%
Account Age
6 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
1,445
Link Karma
938
Comment Karma
452
Profile updated: 2 days ago
Posts updated: 1 day ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
2 months ago