This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Laval is not a good deck even though it relies on one of the strongest mechanics and that with skill (no tear has no skill its gamble) (no mayonesse is not a deck)
but why is it bad if it has cards that other decks can only dream of?
well, some monsters are really strong and would be a wet dream in other decks, but in Laval... oh dear, the best monster was banned because it was generic (beginner mistake Konami, you can do better!)
and the extra deck of the deck is not only ridiculously expensive in MD it is also horribly bad
even the newest synchro monster is laughably bad negate? pah no! destroy and burn damage? YES
and it has rekindling as an effect! is quite nice for link plays? but it doesn't have its own link cards so you have to be boring and resort to generic links Apo and all that stuff
otherwise it works with banishing cards so you could play D.D dynamite I think
what is it about pyro/fire decks that make them want to burn damage and banish themselves? (except boring eyes and Dino 2.0 i.e. fire kings)
laval's strategy is burn damage and synchro spam very slow synchro spam
what laval needs is a good extra deck that works more to improve the burn strategy or more with banished cards since you banish your own cards more often after targeted mills
So basically only 2-3 good cards have to come and Laval could achieve something
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 5 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- i.redd.it/opnvn55ivm6d1....