Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

0
An idea for why we use "stove" (the box) to mean "stovetop" (the surface) but not "oven" (the interior)
Post Body

This is largely copied from one of my very recent comments for which I did a bit of thinking.

In the US, we call the entire box the stove, the surface the range, and the inside the oven (afaik anyway).

Colloquially, we call the surface (i.e. the range) the stove (or stovetop).

So, when you say you're going to buy a stove, people understand you are buying a box that heats things up both on the inside and on the top. But you also wouldn't say "I'll put the cookies in the stove", although you could say "I'll put the pan on the stove" to mean "I'll put the pan on the stovetop", which is synonymous with "I'll put the pan on the range", although you'll get funny looks for that.

I guess it makes sense, because "oven" only takes "in" and "out": you can only put cookies in the oven or take them out. However, "stove", in its meaning as the entire box, can technically take "in", "out", "on", and "off". So, it makes sense to relegate "in" and "out" exclusively to "oven" (since that's its "specialized purpose") leaving "on" and "off" for "stove", which makes it absorb much of the function of "range".

Does this make sense? Does anyone think this might be an adequate explanation?

Author
Account Strength
100%
Account Age
9 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
83,857
Link Karma
382
Comment Karma
73,665
Profile updated: 1 day ago
Posts updated: 4 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
8 years ago