Coming soon - Get a detailed view of why an account is flagged as spam!
view details

This post has been de-listed

It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.

3
Canon EF-M 55-200mm, worth investing in?
Post Body

Hi guys,

I need feedback from you generous APS-C fanatics out there. I'm contemplating between two options for my Canon M50.

Option 1 - EF - M 55 -200mm, is it worth investing in? Are the images crisp and sharp enough? Is it worth the price point?

Option 2 - Canon EF - 70 - 200mm with a viltrox/metabones speed booster and get the best of both worlds, since I own a Canon full frame.

I'm not a huge fan of using speed boosters since the total lack of sharpness around the edges is a deal breaker to me. Although I'm not too sure about metabones speed boosters.

Author
Account Strength
80%
Account Age
3 years
Verified Email
Yes
Verified Flair
No
Total Karma
780
Link Karma
728
Comment Karma
52
Profile updated: 12 hours ago
Posts updated: 10 months ago

Subreddit

Post Details

We try to extract some basic information from the post title. This is not always successful or accurate, please use your best judgement and compare these values to the post title and body for confirmation.
Posted
1 year ago