This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
In this era of global abundance, the existence of famine is a paradox that challenges our collective conscience. Historical events like "The Great Hunger" in Ireland, along with numerous famines in recent history, compel us to question the nature of famine. While natural disasters can trigger food shortages, the most devastating famines are often deeply intertwined with human actions—be they through war, economic policies, or political decisions that disregard the basic right to food.
The stark reality is that famine, in many cases, is not merely a tragedy but a tool of oppression, potentially qualifying as a crime against humanity. This brings us to the urgent need for the global community to adopt a clear stance, recognizing the criminality of famine when it results from intentional acts or gross negligence by those in power.
Criteria for Identifying Criminal Famine: Should there be internationally agreed-upon criteria to differentiate between 'natural' and 'man-made' famines? What role should intent and preventability play in defining a famine as a criminal act?
Mechanisms for Accountability: How can international bodies effectively investigate and hold perpetrators accountable for famine as a crime against humanity? What improvements are needed in international legal frameworks to address the challenges in prosecuting famine-related crimes?
Prevention and Aid: In what ways can international cooperation be enhanced to prevent future famines? How can we ensure that aid reaches those in need promptly and effectively, without being hindered by political barriers?
How can we foster a global culture that sees the prevention of famine not just as a moral duty but as a legal obligation?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 7 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/PoliticalDi...
A lot of this is bordering on hand wave-y.
Digging down into the causes of the Bengal famine we see pretty stark evidence that, while natural and international conditions definitely were a part of the problem, they only led to an actual famine of that magnitude as a direct result of British policy in the region. Trying to say "well there were lots of reasons" is blatantly disregarding the acknowledged history of what happened and why.
Israel is also stopping the majority of aid from entering Gaza and firing on people trying to retrieve dropped aid. Pretending like "so much" is being done is a slap in the face to the material fact that Israel is using starvation as a weapon.
Because it is. If you are going to be an occupier and deny the place you are occupying the ability to do things like produce or import vital resources, you now assume the responsibility of providing those resources and failing or refusing to do so means you are directly responsible for the harm caused by the lack of those resources.