This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
The Education Department explained the relief addresses what it described as "historical inaccuracies" in the count of payments that qualify toward forgiveness under Income Driven Repayment [IDR] plans. Borrowers will be eligible for forgiveness if they have made either 20 or 25 years of monthly IDR payments. [Which is a preexisting policy].
The announcement explains student borrowers impacted by this corrective administrative step will be notified.
This amount is far less than the original Biden's push to forgive $430 billion applicable to millions of borrowers; [earlier blocked by the Supreme Court] it looks like there may be additional incremental "fixes" or adjustments by the Education Department.
Since relief is based on preexisting policy, should we still expect legal challenges?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-administration-forgives-39-bln-student-debt-cnbc-2023-07-14/#:~:text=WASHINGTON, July 14 (Reuters),driven repayment (IDR) plans,driven repayment (IDR) plans).
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 year ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/PoliticalDi...
You're not talking about conspiracy, you're talking about predicting that a crime would be committed. Conspiracy is proven after the crime has been committed and if there's enough evidence to support it (i.e. a paper trail of some kind). Then you can charge someone with conspiracy.
For example, if you and a group of friends all buy guns and gloves and masks and whatnot and plan to commit a crime, there's nothing that the cops can do to stop you from carrying it out just because you have those items. they're all legal for you to own. you'd have to commit the crime, be charged with it, and then the prosecutors would have to prove all of you and your friends conspired to commit this crime together. that's conspiracy.