like, a while a go i was having a conversation with friends and they brough up that some rich dude did not let prople camp on his private property after a natural disaster, and altough i believe it would be nice if he did, i can also say that he wasn't wrong for doing so, becuase what garanteen he has the people who he would let in, if he had opened the gates, wouldn't squat there or loot his property?

i'm going to admit, i'm speaking from a place of reasonbale ignoarance, but a relative of mine did got trough squatter troubles and i saw first hand the honest to god pain in the ass that was getting rid of those.

said friend then said that who cares if people sqaut or if his place looted, he surely has the money to just buy new things if that happens.

long story short, i called it bullshit and he called me an asshole, but is in fact wrong to think that the 'becasue they have the money to' excuse is bullshit?