This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Recap for anyone not following: Miller v. Bonta (the case in CA challenging their assault weapon/ features ban) was ruled by justice Benitez in favor of the plaintiff (unconstitutional.) AG Bonta/ Gov. Newsom appealed, and it was just remanded by their court of appeals, and sent back to Benitez. So, for all intents and purposes, you can count on the assault weapons and features ban in CA to go away pretty soon.
Significance to MD: Justice Benitez’s ruling was based on the NYSRPA v Bruen ruling which focused heavily on the text of the 2nd amendment and our history, and banning specific features or furniture to neuter modern weapons has no historical precedence.
Do you think this bodes well for potentially the same type of challenge holding weight in MD? If the court of appeals in SoCal wasn’t even interested in hearing the appeal it must have a chance here, right?
Don’t mind me, just daydreaming about light barrels and Amazon prime magazine delivery.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 2 years ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/MDGuns/comm...