As we've all heard by now, here is Kohberger's submitted response to the State's alibi demand: https://s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/isc.coi/CR29-22-2805/2024/041724-Notice-Defendants-Supplemental-Response-States-AD.pdf

My question: why did it take 16 months for him to use this as his alibi? He was arrested around 6 weeks after the crime. Surely, his best bet would have been to inform the police that he was at this park, at this time back then?

The park looks pretty popular; although large, there are several areas that could well be covered by surveillance cameras - campsite, restrooms, shelters, parking, the ranger's home etc.

Would Kohberger not have been better off telling law enforcement this in December so there was at least a chance (however small) of recoverable camera footage, confirming his alibi?

Or, has he waited this long to see where else his cell phone pings could have put him (according to the CAST report), knowing full well there wouldn't be any recoverable camera footage now to confirm or deny?

Or, per the last line of the document, are they going to try for a Brady violation?

What do you guys think?