This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
Been reading details here and there, as well analysis from people responses in here, I end up thinking that there is no way for Nazi Germany to ever win the war.
Let us begin:
1: Too many fronts at the same time.
I always thought about it. But the details on how strategies were made pretty much proved it true. Nazi Germany spread their forces too thin. With many of their armies poorly equipped or poorly supplied. Resulting in otherwise different results.
Trouble here is that many countries were against it. If they reinforced a front and left the other unattended, their many enemies would have seen the opening.
2: Not enough resources
This one was the reason why America and Russia were able to aid so much. Russia had many Russians. Like, a lot of Russians. Because when freezing cold is a sunny day, the obvious thing to do is having kids. And drink gasoline-like alcohol.
Also, contrary to Aryan theory, Russians had evolved to resist cold. So, kudos to Russians for doing the evolution.
America had more money than God. And technology. Guess when one of your Founding Fathers were a horny scientist and anti-tax business men, that's the way to go.
I mean, the Average Joe literally threw cash at the government to mass produce stuff. Even if they didn't send in people, they could have showered their allies with guns.
Germany wasn't doing well. Their strategy was basically "Medieval Conquest", where the true win was measured in gold seized.
Their mass-production methods weren't organized. And much money was spent on stuff which wasn't 100% guaranteed to work. Or ever built.
3: They were killing themselves already
Besides streamlining mass murder, they were also mass producing drug addicts.
Thanks to quacks whose only merit was that they were party members, they literally told their own people that doing cocaine and alcohol was A-OK. If you became an alcoholic or a junkie, it was your fault.
And if we check on the mass murder of the handicapped, the homosexuals, and anyone they see as problems that would mean they would be slowing down their own progress.
Einstein was a Jew. Alan Turing was Gay. Garrett Morgan, who invented the yellow light in traffic lights, was black. The Brittish guy who made breakthroughs in Naval strategies had Tuberculosis.
If not malnourished in an alley, or blasted on the side road, they would likely kill a potential genius. Simply because they had some condition they weren't bothered to treat.
4: They worked hard turning themselves in Global Enemy #1
We kinda always knew the US did genocide against the natives. We know from the bible itself the Hebrew did do a genocide against the Hittites and the Amenites. That last is a gazillion years old.
Word of the genocide would eventually spread.
From here, my thoughts goes into mass anexation to the Soviet Union out of fear of turning into lamps and soap.
And lessening of animosity against Socialism because the other option is a bunch of racist mass murderers.
Who knows, the Arab nations might as well be given more liberties from England to gather strenght against the Nazis.
Even with the A-Bomb, my money is on the US sharing the knowledge in hopes that either the Russians or the Brittish manages to nuke Germany out of the history book.
If we take the declarations from Nazi officers during the Nuremberg Trials, it's likely they themselves shoot the Fürher themselves if the other option is a nuclear wasteland.
Also, more than likely, they would be able to either nuke England or Russia.
No "Nuke Washington" as in The Man in the High Castle.
Remembering those old history debates, when you'd lose hours in a rabbit hole, realizing just how much was stacked against them from the start.
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 1 month ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/HistoryWhat...