This post has been de-listed
It is no longer included in search results and normal feeds (front page, hot posts, subreddit posts, etc). It remains visible only via the author's post history.
It seems to be lost on a disturbingly large amount of people what Fiona Harvey has done to multiple people over many decades. She is not a victim - the people that she has stalked and harassed are the victim. The entire point of baby reindeer was to portray the brokenness of both the stalker and their victim.
In Reading a majority of the claims coming from the UK towards Netflix and Richard G this all seems to actually pivot around the term being used of CONVICTED stalker. So the focus now is to produce proof that she was ever convicted of at least one of her many many horrific stalking crimes.
I would think that the UK and Parliament would be rather embarrassed by the fact that they never reached out to help any of these victims of Fiona Harvey. Yet here they are trying to go after Netflix over that one creative license taken by the VICTIM and author of baby reindeer. This is His story not hers.
What is going on with people in the world?! Fiona should have been slapped with multiple legal fines, restraint orders and probably convictions from any one of her stalking tangents. If anyone is not familiar with the other incredibly horrible events of stalking Fiona pursued just Google it up. Some involved a disabled child.
🤔 Obviously I'm missing something or I am really seeing the lack of empathy in society as this all unfold in front of us. Am I just not looking at this right?!
Exactly and it doesn’t mean she’s not a shitty stalker. It means Netflix owes her which very well could be part of their math on this being a hit show.
You think going to prison is the result of a civil trial over a TV show?
That’s a matter of public record.
If what Netflix showed doesn’t reconcile she has a case.
The disclaimer isn’t going to save them from a settlement.
People think any nuance is a defense of all of her actions.
Same in the US. It’s rarely used to imprison anyone.
Yes, just because she sucks doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.
If it’s fiction why is there a real person with real news articles you can find from dialog verbatim from the show? Why are there real emails and Twitter posts you can find verbatim errors and all?
Your argument is completely trash Gay Void Daddy.
Blair Witch doesn’t point directly to a real witch. See how dumb your argument is?
It’s not presented as fiction. Please join reality.
Too many people will take this the wrong way but if Netflix portrayed her as a convicted criminal and factual she isn’t that’s going to be a problem for Netflix no matter how you feel about Fiona.
Secondly, it’s irresponsible to put a mentally ill person in the public microscope which is exactly what Netflix and Morgan did.
As much as the public lusts for vengeance and drama she’s clearly mentally ill.
So you see how them portraying her as pleading guilty is exactly what she didn’t do?
You’re almost there.
It literally means she still has a case.
Dealing in reality is helpful Gay Void Daddy.
It wasn’t thrown out, so she does. This is the reality.
Good luck living in the construct of your own mind.
They didn’t say it was a true story or IDed the real person in the show.
Too many people can’t separate her actions from Netflix.
It doesn’t matter how bad of a person she is.
The show gives the exact web search to out her.
They depicted her as pleading guilty and being convicted. That’s the issue.
If you say 300 true things and 2 that aren’t, the 300 true things aren’t a relevant excuse.
I don’t expect the unintelligent common Redditor to grasp that but by all means try.
They used the exact search input to get her name and said it was a true story. She’ll get a settlement for sure.
And if that secret is partially defamation what then?
Subreddit
Post Details
- Posted
- 6 months ago
- Reddit URL
- View post on reddit.com
- External URL
- reddit.com/r/BabyReindee...
The number one thing she won’t do is admit guilt. So that becomes problematic saying she did.